Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 December 29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 29

[edit]


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as T3 by Shirt58 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Big Yellow Button (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is obsolete because the category it uses, Category:Articles the need to be Wikified, no longer exists. The template that put articles in that category, Template:Wikify, has been deprecated since August due to this nomination for deletion. This button no longer does anything, so I recommend its deletion.  Liam987(talk) 18:05, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:46, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Not a help page (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

We have more standardised banners than this one. This is huge and IMO aggressive. We should always assume good faith. Magioladitis (talk) 10:34, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think {{not a forum}} and {{talk header}} can do. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:42, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Relisting comment: To better establish consensus
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 03:09, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 06:56, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. (NACArmbrust The Homunculus 11:41, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Finalhist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Magioladitis (talk) 21:51, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Relisting comment: Only three reviewers after two weeks
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 03:09, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 07:19, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete or userfy Frietjes (talk) 19:11, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment — To avoid misunderstanding, when I said the template could generally be substituted, I meant it could be modified to be substituted, since, at minimum, the two uses of {{REVISIONID}} should be something like {{{{{|safesubst:}}}REVISIONID}} for it to actually work as intended when substituted and transcluded. —PC-XT+ 19:58, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, my logic was backwards. {{REVISIONID}} should be transcluded in the result. —PC-XT+ 20:04, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Scott Cooper (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN, links only two articles. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 22:59, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 07:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator....William 11:25, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not needed for only two film articles. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:10, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Skeleton novel (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not in use. Project page without edits for over 2 years. Have posted a notification there as well. Recommend straightforward deletion. Debresser (talk) 19:39, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 07:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Article on novels are individual entities. While a basic template for what to consider in such an article is nice, using such a template in an article does not work. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:09, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We have 3 people here who want to delete this, and it was relisted by a non-admin for no other reason than that nobody had deleted it yet by the time he came along (I asked him on his talk page). Can we delete this now? Debresser (talk) 19:19, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:12, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Ampang Line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox Batu Caves-Port Klang Line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox BRT Sunway Line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox Kelana Jaya Line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox MRT Sungai Buloh-Kajang Line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox Rawang-Seremban Line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox Shah Alam Line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

single use templates, should be merged with the articles, then deleted. Frietjes (talk) 16:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 07:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:12, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox KLRT route (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

mostly redundant to template:infobox rail line, just need to add the line striping, and it's entirely redundant. only a handful of transclusions. I propose replacing it with the standard infobox, then deleting it. Frietjes (talk) 15:58, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 07:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.