Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 August 25

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 25

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 September 14Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:05, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Estonian dialects (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge, it appears the issues have been fixed by splitting the long lists. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:HPC rowt (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Labelled as "temporary template" a year ago; redundant to {{HPC row}}. Now that {{Coord}} is coded using lua, the number of transclusions is less critical. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:04, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:36, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NRHP row2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; undocumented; unedited for a year. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:56, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. ...William 12:14, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete as unused. Frietjes (talk) 21:53, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:36, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NYCLP row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unfinished, marked as such for 12 months Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:50, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator....William 12:14, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:38, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pp doc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used anywhere, and I can't figure out what it's supposed to be for. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:47, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:51, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hotels in Norfolk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a large and messy list of buildings, most of which are architecturally and historically non-notable and won't ever warrant even a mention on the town's page, let alone their own article. Breaking a list of hotels down by "star rating" makes no sense - since England doesn't have an official hotel ranking system, this is completely arbitrary since, for instance, the AA will often give a different star ranking than TripAdvisor which in turn will give a different ranking than VisitEngland. Looking at Category:Hotel templates, there is no other comparable "list of every hotel" template for anywhere in the world - there are templates like {{Hotels in Paris}} but they only list the genuinely significant buildings, not a catch-all list. Given how big this is even for a sparsely-populated place like Norfolk, going down this route would lead to enormously bloated templates bigger than the articles themselves in the case of somewhere like Moscow, New York or Hong Kong.  Mogism (talk) 16:07, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.