Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 August 10

< August 9	August 11 >

August 10

Template:Infobox Musique (artiste)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:46, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Musique (artiste) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to Template:Infobox musical artist, and unused. Copy of fr:Modèle:Infobox Musique (artiste). –Quiddity (talk) 08:01, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:01, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 18:20, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Redirect future article

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:46, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Redirect future article (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. The template is completely unused, and its purpose is already taken by the template {{R with possibilities}}. I figure that the creator of this template was unaware of the existence of {{R with possibilities}} when he/she created "{{Redirect future article}}"—a poorly named template to begin with. (In addition, this template is entitled with the incorrect and nonstandard prefix "Template:Redirect" rather than the standard prefix for redirect templates, "Template:R ", adding to further inconsistency.) Since the intended usage of this template is already taken up by another template, and since it remains unused, there is absolutely no reason to keep it. — |J ~Pæst| 05:11, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:07, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 18:21, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Redirect from renumbered standard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:44, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Redirect from renumbered standard (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. The template is placed on only one single redirect (found here), almost as if it were created specifically for this redirect. Its intended usage seems to be extremely small, as the claim for being a "renumbered standard" would likely only apply to a handful of ISO standards that have been renamed. However, I can only guess what its real intended usage is; the template does not contain a description or documentation of any sort. (In addition, this template is entitled with the incorrect and nonstandard prefix "Template:Redirect" rather than the standard prefix for redirect templates, "Template:R ", adding to further inconsistency.) Even if the template can be put to use, there is no need for such a small, overly specific redirect template that can apply to no more than five or so redirects, when instead, these few redirects can be tagged with the larger template {{R from former name}}. This would encompass all of the templates from "renumbered" ISO (and other) standards, and thus using "{{Redirect from renumbered standard}}" is pointless. — |J ~Pæst| 05:11, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:02, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 18:22, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.