Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 8

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 8

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was substitute and delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:53, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Buenos Aires elections, 2011 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Catamarca elections, 2011 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Salta elections, 2011 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:La Rioja elections, 2011 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

One-use templates; used only in Argentine provincial elections, 2011. Should be substituted and deleted. Robofish (talk) 22:43, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean with "substituted"?--Andres arg (talk) 03:49, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:Substitution. Basically it means copy the contents of the template directly into the article. Instead of having the data in a template, you would have the data directly in the article. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I'm fine with it, I think I did the template because I saw in another page that it was done on that way. Greetings.--Andres arg (talk) 05:23, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Templates such as this can be used to clean up the source of the page. Rather than wading through a large, bulky table, editors only see the template markup. This doesn't impede editability because of the edit and discuss links on the template. Ryan Vesey 20:27, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete after merging the contents with the article. having the content in the article is easier to maintain (in my opinion). Frietjes (talk) 15:06, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 08:13, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tip (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant template with {{Totd}} and {{Styletips}}. It only used one place and can easily be replaced by Totd. Creator is okay with it being deleted [1]. meshach (talk) 01:20, 29 August 2012 (UTC) withdrawn by nominator meshach (talk) 05:31, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:10, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 08:13, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Zeb and Haniya (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN The Banner talk 17:21, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, author moved the template to List of Aztec deities, so I suppose take it to AfD if it should still be deleted? Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:20, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Aztec gods (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Plain text, used in only one article. Text can be included there. The Banner talk 17:20, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:28, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:U.M.N. Network box (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless external link to a Wikia Wiki. Only used for Xenosaga characters, and thus only two have actual articles (Shion Uzuki and KOS-MOS), it's hardly even used. Cyan Gardevoir (used EDIT!) 04:57, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.