Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 November 23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 23

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:21, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sinéad Quinn (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary navbox. One album and two songs (both from the same album), each of which is linkable to and from one another as well as the main topic article. WP:NENAN. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:57, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:18, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Adi Shakti Peethas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I could not find any references saying that the four mentioned are could Adi Shakti Pithas. WP:OR in Shakti Peetha article. Redtigerxyz Talk 17:41, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above contention is right. The last two are Adi Shakthi Pithas but the first two, though Shakthi Pithas, are not listed as the four Adi Shakthi Pithas. Hence, it may be better to rename the template header as "Four Popular Shakthi Pithas" of Eastern and Western India.--Nvvchar. 07:17, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:27, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Select skin on page (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Select skin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Select skin on page with Template:Select skin.
This template is a fork of Template:Select skin, made this April, and not used at all now. The only difference is that this template takes an argument to specify the page to test skins, replacing all {{FULLPAGENAME}} with {{{1|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}. (And the lead sentence.) But it can be merged into Template:Select skin, and there's no need for a separate template. Ahora (talk) 11:00, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.