Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 November 19

< November 18	November 20 >

November 19

Template:Mayors of Tacloban City

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:00, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mayors of Tacloban City (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Whats the use of a template if its all empty links? This thing will find better use in a section in the main article. --RioHondo (talk) 14:51, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as pointless. The Tacloban article already has the exact same list of mayors, and that's where it belongs. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:33, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Navigates nothing; serves no current purpose. Xeltran (talk) 11:12, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:San Jose del Monte City Barangays

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:01, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:San Jose del Monte City Barangays (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox does not seem warranted. Navigates between two pages only. --RioHondo (talk) 14:39, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not needed for 2 entries. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:36, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not navigate anything at all (2 articles don't count as substantial navigation). Unnecessary. Xeltran (talk) 11:12, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Eastern Visayas Provinces

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Eastern Visayas Provinces (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Region VIII Eastern Visayas}}. --RioHondo (talk) 14:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:37, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Redundant and already deprecated. Xeltran (talk) 11:11, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cordillera Administrative Region Provinces

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cordillera Administrative Region Provinces (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant to {{Cordillera Administrative Region}}. --RioHondo (talk) 14:28, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:37, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Deprecated by the newer template. Redundant and likely unused. Xeltran (talk) 11:10, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Region XII SOCCSKSARGEN

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:06, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Region XII SOCCSKSARGEN (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{SOCCSKSARGEN}}. --RioHondo (talk) 14:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:37, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Redundant and deprecated by newer, standardized template. Xeltran (talk) 11:05, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Calamba City Barangays

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:08, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Calamba City Barangays (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough articles to warrant a template. Links to only three. --RioHondo (talk) 14:17, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not needed for 3 links. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:38, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Substantially navigates nothing. Xeltran (talk) 11:04, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:EDSA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EDSA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete for the same reasons as Template:South Luzon Expressway and Template:North Luzon Expressway: Mostly a collection of links of cities, landmarks and intersections thru which the road runs. I mean what's the point? Not everything needs a navbox. --RioHondo (talk) 12:42, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per precedents. IMO, it is template overkill to link every city and landmark together in one template. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:26, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above and WP:RJL. --Rs chen 7754 04:39, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Quite simply a fine example of template overkill. Xeltran (talk) 15:25, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the last two, and if there are any more, please group nominate them so we can be done. Imzadi 1979 → 13:28, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Major Malls in Laguna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:10, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Major Malls in Laguna (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A template that supposedly aims to navigate "malls and supermarkets" but only links a handful of articles. The rest of template is basically just a list. Much of the rational behind this nomination can be found at WP:NENAN (even though it's technically just an essay and not a guideline). It all boils down to if this template is actually necessary and useful in the first place. Xeltran (talk) 01:35, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. --RioHondo (talk) 12:46, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Also contrary to WP:NOTDIRECTORY. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:39, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you will delete this template, Template:Malls in Cavite should also be nominated for deletion. -Othanwiki2009 (T)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Phantogram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:11, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Phantogram (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Too few blue links (the duo's main page, one album, one EP) to warrant a navbox at this time (WP:NENAN). Gongshow ^Talk 09:40, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:33, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Too few links. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:56, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it. The band is still active (they're working on a new album). There will be more content on this template in the future.Deepblue1 (talk) 21:30, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:01, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. With articles for only one album and one EP, navigation is simple enough amongst these 3 articles without the need of a navbox. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 08:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.