Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 May 19

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< May 18 May 20 >

May 19[edit]

Template:Newtest[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:29, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Newtest (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used only on one page, Wikipedia:Newbie treatment at Criteria for speedy deletion/Skomorokh, which is a subpage of a page retained for historical reference (used ~2 times on that page, so could be easily substituted).  Hazard-SJ  ✈  22:06, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bridgeport Bluefish[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, all the links are section links within the article, with the exception of the link to the ballpark. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:43, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bridgeport Bluefish (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Recommending deletion of this navbox. Only used on two articles: The Bridgeport Bluefish baseball team's and the team's ballpark. Most of the links on the template just direct to sections on the team's article; the others direct to items already easily found on the article. —Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 16:17, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Trivia[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:40, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Trivia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I've only seen one "Trivia" header in the past couple years. As it stands, this template has 0 transclusions in article space, so the "trivia" bug has been eradicated. The last few trivia sections I've seen were actually "in popular culture" sections, for which we have {{In popular culture}} and {{examplefarm}}. With general trivia sections a thing of the past, I think it's time to get rid of the template. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 11:20, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. I am very sympathetic to TPH's argument but there are articles out there with trivia sections (I cleaned up a big walled garden of them a few months back) so I think it would be helpful to retain this. If there are zero transclusions at the moment, that's cause for temporary satisfaction rather than deletion. bobrayner (talk) 22:24, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – Why go through the hassle to remake this template? It costs us nothing to keep it "at the ready" when needed in the future. Senator2029 (talk) 05:37, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - even if no article on the almost 4 million Wikipedia has a trivia section (which is highly unlikely), there probably will be ones in the future. CyanGardevoir 10:27, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Original Premier League Clubs[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:27, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Original Premier League Clubs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This seems like an navbox too far. There is nothing particularly special about this group of clubs, as the Premier League was effectively a continuation of the Football League First Division - these 20 clubs were just those that happened to be in the top flight when the Premier League was created. (Note: this template was deleted once before, way back in 2006.) 86.164.110.70 (talk) 07:03, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 18:27, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2012_May_19&oldid=1138535807"