Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 May 17

< May 16	May 18 >

May 17

Template:Ancient Georgian Tribes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no objections to a merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:51, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ancient Georgian Tribes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Ancient Georgians (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Ancient Georgian Tribes with Template:Ancient Georgians.
The 2 templates both list ancient Georgian people; the 2nd is of broader scope, but has only 2 entries. They are used in exacly the same articles. Susuman77 (talk) 16:48, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:13, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment either way, these need "(country)" added to their names, since it is not about the ancient tribes found in Georgia (U.S. state). 70.24.251.208 (talk) 05:13, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:D'Sound

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:50, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:D'Sound (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No longer used. All related articles have been either redirected or deleted. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:46, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DVD extra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:50, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DVD extra (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 17:24, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DCoCH

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:49, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DCoCH (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused boilerplate. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 17:22, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DCTeam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:49, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DCTeam (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 17:21, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DC area bus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:49, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DC area bus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

replaced by template:Transit In DC. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 17:20, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:National Men's Open Championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:48, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:National Men's Open Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not in use and doesn't look like it will be used. Banana Fingers (talk) 15:38, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete, mostly redlinks and redirects. Frietjes (talk) 15:43, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Summary flag

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:00, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Summary flag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is unused and the coding is broken, so cannot be used in any case. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 04:51, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've discovered that this template is related directly to {{summary top}} , {{summary bottom}} , {{summary row}}; so because Template:Summary flag is broken, this entire set of four templates is broken. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 05:10, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Summary top

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:00, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Summary top (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is an unused abandoned test template. Further it is broken, because it is part of a set of four templates all needed to work together, one of which is broken. {{summary flag}} , {{summary top}} , {{summary bottom}} , {{summary row}}; so because Template:Summary flag is broken, this entire set of four templates is broken. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 05:13, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Summary bottom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:00, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Summary bottom (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is an unused abandoned test template. Further it is broken, because it is part of a set of four templates all needed to work together, one of which is broken. {{summary flag}} , {{summary top}} , {{summary bottom}} , {{summary row}}; so because Template:Summary flag is broken, this entire set of four templates is broken. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 05:13, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:USS Liberty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:48, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USS Liberty (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is being used to argue a point of view about the Liberty incident, rather than be a genuine navigational assistant. It states there is a coverup when that is in dispute, it supplies external links, it gives extraneous biographical information, it ignores Captain William McGonagle, etc. In fact there aren't that many articles related to the Liberty incident and there is no need for a nav template. Wasted Time R (talk) 01:15, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wasted Time R. Are you being payed to write here? -DePiep (talk) 01:23, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I rest my case. Wasted Time R (talk) 01:32, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment if this is kept, it definitely needs to be renamed, since it is about the incident, not ships named Liberty. USS Liberty is not the topic of this template, so it should be called Template:USS Liberty incident. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 04:31, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not seem NPOV, contains inflammatory "links" that do not link to anything (ie: "U.S. cover up"), contains tangential info (ie: "father of..."). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Autumnalmonk (talk • contribs) 04:47, 17 May 2012
Delete - Template not required for small number of related articles, content should be covered in Liberty incident article and adding template to IDF page would be "Undue". I note also that it is does not appear to be adhering to plicy on NPOV but advancing a viewpoint not supported by article. GraemeLeggett (talk) 19:29, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Half of it is POV and the other half is unnecessary. Reso lute 20:41, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and close for WP:SNOWBALL. The template did not mature as expected. I can add that not many of the arguments here, including noms, point to deletion (edits would do). Me the creator, -DePiep (talk) 16:44, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.