Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 July 19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 19

[edit]


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as T3 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 05:52, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox SMF (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not sure what if anything this was intended to be used for, but it doesn't seem to be used for anything. -- Selket Talk 22:37, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:42, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WakkaWiki (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

doesn't link much. Frietjes (talk) 20:59, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per CSD#T3. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:24, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tpfd-1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-6 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-1p1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-1p2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-1p3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-2p1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-2p2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-2p3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-2p4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-2s1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-3p1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-3p2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-3p3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-1s0 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-1s1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-3s023 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-3s1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-3s2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-4s13 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tpfd-7s3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

back in the ancient past, we apparently didn't have "urlencode" and had to make a series of templates to manually urlencode our links. thankfully, these templates have all been replaced by one template, {{tpfr}}, so these can be safely deleted. Frietjes (talk) 20:32, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:45, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:OPCS4.2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

appears to not be that popular. Frietjes (talk) 19:35, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:46, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Historic structures (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 19:26, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:46, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:JORF-law-copy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 19:25, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:46, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lawson (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A case of WP:TOOSOON and WP:NENAN. Only two directly related articles easily navigable from one to the other. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:04, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:47, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:German title Baron (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 18:08, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Unused, and it states the obvious. Most readers probably already know that Baron is a title and not a first or middle name, and we certainly don't need a template for it.--SGCM (talk) 01:09, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Gadget850 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:02, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Markup2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, undocumented, uncategorized. Frietjes (talk) 17:36, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. I was going somewhere with this, but it didn't work out. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 23:30, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, this seems to be better covered by a category, due large number channels. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:54, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:YouTube original channels (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Oversized template of barely related topics, most of which aren't even notable enough to have an article. Otterathome (talk) 23:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:20, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by GB fan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:05, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sachin fan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Should be renamed to {{User Sachin fan}}, per Wikipedia:Userboxes#Which namespace? which states: "In the template namespace, userbox names must begin with "User ". DH85868993 (talk) 02:55, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question. Isn't this just an uncontroversial move? The handful of transclusions could be fixed in a moment.  davidiad.: 03:00, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I believe so, but if I move it, it will leave behind a redirect, which I would then have to nominate for deletion. So I figured I may as well just nominate the original template, and let the tools handle the move and the transclusions. DH85868993 (talk) 03:02, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As per my statement here, i have no problems with this deletion. Regards, Anir1uph | talk | contrib 09:49, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:52, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Peloponnese (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Purpose unclear (to me, anyway). DH85868993 (talk) 01:05, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Superseded by {{Kallikratis-Peloponnese}} which is helpful and actually used on its constituents' pages.  davidiad.: 01:34, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What do you see as the advantages of redirecting over deleting? DH85868993 (talk) 06:44, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Access via a shorter name. -- 76.65.131.160 (talk) 07:35, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree with redirect, although IMO a template with this name it should serve a better purpose: the Peloponnese as a whole (not the aministrative region) is a very distinct geographical, historical and even cultural entity. Until someone writes such a template, however, let's redirect to the admin. definition. Constantine 15:53, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:50, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pelalawan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. Only one blue link, which is a stub article. I suspect it's unlikely the other linked articles will ever be created. DH85868993 (talk) 00:49, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.