Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 August 9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 9

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn now that template is exapnded. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 19:15, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nichole Nordeman (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN, Links only 3 articles. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 22:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Duplicate. Magioladitis (talk) 09:19, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox Afghan-Maratha Wars (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused virtual copy of Template:Campaignbox Afghan-Maratha Conflicts. SuperMarioMan 22:14, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 09:20, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Shimoga (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Incomplete navigational template with zero transclusions. If the creator intends to expand this, a move to userspace may be preferable to deletion. SuperMarioMan 22:08, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Better similar template exists. Magioladitis (talk) 09:23, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Help! (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is practically redundant with Template:help, if not technically (it seems to be intended for use in articlespace, which strikes me as a poor way to do things). This effectively qualifies it for WP:TFD#REASONS #2, particularly because the template it is redundant to uses a tracking category to ensure request visibility. BigNate37(T) 22:08, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 09:35, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Non-free media information and use rationale (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The non-free use rationale and licence of a file description page that does not seem to exist - not an actual file description template. Unused and untranscluded. SuperMarioMan 22:00, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 09:35, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Europe Innovation University (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Non-existent infobox. SuperMarioMan 21:54, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 09:35, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Europe University (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Non-existent infobox. SuperMarioMan 21:52, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted. G3 as a blatant hoax. The Bushranger One ping only 01:31, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:San Francisco Dogs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Article in template namespace. Either about an obscure work of fiction or a hoax, as a Google search of "San Francisco Dogs" turns up nothing that is clearly connected to what is described here. SuperMarioMan 21:43, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Navboxes should navigate between existing pages. Magioladitis (talk) 09:46, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Indonesian martial arts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused at the time of nomination and consisting mostly of red links to non-existent articles, reducing template's usefulness as a navigational aid. SuperMarioMan 21:34, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 09:47, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Café Bossa tracks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Another one complete unused and unnecessary as all songs are covers and not notable by the artist, Sitti Navarro. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:40, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 10:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Christmas in Our Hearts tracks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This one is unused and will never be used as all the songs on this album are Christmas song covered by numerous artists. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:29, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 10:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cutterpillow tracks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Completely unnecessary and excessive. used on only one article and fails to navigate to anywhere else. To view the full tracklist one can just link to Cutterpillow from the same article. [As an aside, what do people feel about these tracklist templates in general? There seem to have been a number of them created recently.]StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:23, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've created the category Category:Album track list templates for such templates. I didn't realize there were so many of them. I've nominated a few others as I've been going through them. Not sure of the need for those for a 12-track album with articles for only three of its songs, but that's for another discussion. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:17, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tl;dr (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Kind of silly and apparently not in use, discounting links from other templates Nobody Ent 13:49, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox etnic group (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use template; no longer used since I substituted it. No longer needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:34, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jafeluv (talk) 10:41, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Grounded (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unlikely scenario. Only a few people have ever used this. Rcsprinter (articulate) @ 09:25, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.