Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 October 23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 23

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was G2, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 21:42, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Accession OIC states graphical timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Non-functional for a year, not used anywhere. GregorB (talk) 11:39, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep until articles are merged. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:44, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Disney Resort Line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All of the articles in this navbox are to be merged into Disney Resort Line as consensus of AfDs. Rcsprinter (shout) 10:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Insufficient blue links to be useful; redlinked players are not likely to satisfy WP:NFOOTY for a year or two. Redrose64 (talk) 19:33, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Serbia U17 Squad Euro 2011 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template full of red links, not particularly useful. Too low a level a tournament in terms of the age range involved. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 14:49, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.