Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 October 11

< October 10	October 12 >

October 11[edit]

Template:M1 motorway junction list[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:30, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:M1 motorway junction list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

~~Transclude~~Subst and delete—template space is not the place to hold article information. This "template" is transcluded to two locations in mainspace: M1 motorway and M1 motorway junction list, the latter of which is at AfD because it is a duplicate of the main article's content. Imzadi 1979 → 22:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above, we don't need two copies. P.S. "subst and delete"? :P --Rs chen 7754 22:36, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks... brain fart here. Imzadi 1979 → 22:39, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment please see Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2008_September_17#Exit_list_templates and Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2008_August_15#Template:Hollywood_Freeway_.28US_101.29_exit_list. --Rs chen 7754 22:40, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Subst into M1 motorway and then delete. M1 motorway junction list is a pointless non-article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:49, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wait - deletion request is premature. This template is an essential part of the article M1 motorway junction list and as long as that artcile is in existance, this template must stay. May I also draw to attention to Basingstoke Canal and template:Basingstoke Canal map. This pair of articles demonstate how another group always uses templates. Martinvl (talk) 07:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- {{Basingstoke Canal map}} is a complicated piece of template logic split out to make the main article easier to edit. This is just a table. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 13:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- May I also note that this template could be substituted into both articles and deleted, and either article would be any different, so this TfD is independent of the AfD, even though the content is related. Imzadi 1979 → 02:53, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete - the subst will resolve the concern expressed by Martinvl. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:21, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete, i substituted it into M1 motorway. the other article is deleted, so no need to substitute it there, or worry about duplication. Frietjes (talk) 16:29, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Peanuts television specials[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:31, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Peanuts television specials (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Does this template serve any purpose that is not covered by {{Peanuts}}? ~T P W 21:43, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

keep, and cut the "television specials" section from the main "peanuts" template, replacing it with a link to an article which lists all the television specials. The {{peanuts}} template is way too big right now, and should be pruned. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 21:30, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and trim {{peanuts}}, per 198. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:00, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
comment, now trimmed as suggested. Frietjes (talk) 17:10, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Blockid[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:31, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Blockid (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 14:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete, very old and unused. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 21:31, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:'clavicytherium'[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete as test page. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:29, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:'clavicytherium' (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Improper use of a template to create article content. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 09:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.