Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 November 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 13

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 22:40, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Unn (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template without any potential use. Armbrust Talk to me about my editsreview 22:48, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 November 21#Template:Carlos Saldanha. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:14, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep, but reformat. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:53, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:American folklore (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Ginormous template harnessing a totally slapdash, random who's who of famous people from Columbus to MLK. And somehow in the same damn template, we've got things like Br'er Rabbit, jackalopes and a mish mash of cultural archetypes like lumberjacks. This template can't make up its mind what it wants to be. It's huge, unwieldy and unfocused, tying together way too wide of a scope of stuff. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:42, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Goodness! I don't even remember creating this, but looking back on the templates history, I see it was originally "American tall tales", which seems a legitimate (and not overly ginormous) template to me. Move back to "American tall tales" and edit accordingly. — the Man in Question (in question) 02:54, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Infobox Shipwreck event and location templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete after information has been transfered. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:52, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Ship Wreck Event (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox Ship Wreck Location (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Per conversation at WT:SHIPS it is felt that the above two templates are redundant to the existing {{Infobox ship begin}}. The parameters in both of the above templates contain information that can be placed in the ship begin template while other information belongs in the body of the article. The location parameter is redundant to the availability of simple placement in the article body; etc. Brad (talk) 05:37, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment shipwrecks are not generally mobile, so if infobox ship is used on these articles where ships have become immobile parts of the environment, then the coordinates should be included somehow, like how {{infobox building}} has a location parameter. It doesn't need to be a shipwreck to become something like this, the Queen Mary is a permanently moored hotel, so has literally become a building. 70.24.248.23 (talk) 07:26, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:57, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template with redundant information from Template:Kanye West singles. | helpdןǝɥ | 04:04, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:57, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Loud (Rihanna album) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template with redundant information from Template:Rihanna singles. | helpdןǝɥ | 04:01, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Per nomination. Big Rihanna fan and heavy editor of her articles, but I have to agree with Tomica1111...it seems to me that it's premature. Unless Loud becomes such a huge cultural phenomenon that it inspires 5 more articles, it seems to be quite redundant. If it becomes the rule that albums with 10 articles get their own template, then I guess it's fine but it seems like overkill.--mikomango mwa! 05:20, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.