Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 May 12
May 12
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 19:14, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Redundant to {{Philosophy of religion}} and/or {{Irreligion Sidebar}}. Purpose and criteria for link inclusion ill-defined. Cybercobra (talk) 22:34, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per Cybercobra - hopelessly incomplete and redundant to existing templates. Robofish (talk) 22:51, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Strong keep My template is not complete. I am in the midst of a discussion and plan to propose various criteria, but i have been busy lately so didn't have the time. This is a premature nomination. Pass a Method talk 11:22, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - redundant, ill-defined, and only has 3 or 4 links in it anyway. There are already contentious responses about about what to include, with "editorial intuition" apparently the only ultimately deciding factor --JimWae (talk) 19:18, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete for the reasons stated above. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:21, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 19:12, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned template, doesn't appear to have been used since its creation in 2006. There is no article for Slicksville Animation (whatever that is), so this template doesn't appear to have any potential usage. IllaZilla (talk) 20:08, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - of no obvious use. Robofish (talk) 23:00, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 09:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Kumioko (talk) 18:57, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 08:57, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
not used by High-speed rail by country and not updated in over a year. Frietjes (talk) 19:26, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - orphaned and redundant. Robofish (talk) 22:59, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 09:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.