Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 June 5

< June 4	June 6 >

June 5

Template:FacultyLaw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:24, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FacultyLaw (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only has a single use. The more general {{Infobox university}} would do instead. WOSlinker (talk) 22:54, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 23:02, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tokyo Mew Mew

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:13, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tokyo Mew Mew (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigates three articles. WP:NENAN. JJ98 (Talk) 19:54, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not very useful. --Anthem 20:27, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Navigates five articles not three, I do not think the author is really needed in the template and everything in the article is easily within reach. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:05, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Candidate for Goddess

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:12, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Candidate for Goddess (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not everything needs a navbox. Only navigates 3 articles -- that can be easily handled by a see-also section. Auntof6 (talk) 01:18, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 23:00, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete navagates five articles not three, delete though as it is all in the main article. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:11, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:True Jackson, VP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:16, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:True Jackson, VP (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Linked articles are already well connected. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:07, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Agree with nominator. This template seems yet another example of editors thinking a favorite TV show should have a navbox when in reality one is wholly unnecessary or redundant. --Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 05:04, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All inbound links duplicate links within article body. Nate • (chatter) 18:05, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Sgt. R.K. Blue --Auntof6 (talk) 00:20, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Nate. - Presidentman talk·contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 13:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Kid vs. Kat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:18, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kid vs. Kat (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Doesn't really navigation anything. Mostly redirects and redlinks. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:57, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - 3 out of four of the template's links point to the same page. Doesn't aid enough in navigation to merit having the navbox. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 03:17, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Everything loops back to the same article or links that are in same article. No navigation need for this template. Nate • (chatter) 18:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.