Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 June 28

< June 27	June 29 >

June 28

Template:The Gibson County Toyota Teamwork Classic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 01:48, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Gibson County Toyota Teamwork Classic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN – a (confusing, unaesthetic) navbox for a questionably notable high school basketball tournament does not need to exist for any reason. Jrcla2 (talk) 20:07, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Turkish Basketball League 2008-2009 Season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 01:48, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Turkish Basketball League 2008-2009 Season (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Speedy delete. Unused template containing nothing but redlinks. Jrcla2 (talk) 20:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Landskap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Big Dom 17:24, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Landskap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to infobox state/province (settlement). "Symbols" can be added elsewhere.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:48, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which is it redundant to, and has that been checked? This ancient, gnarly old thing has a quite different layout to the usual geo infoboxes, and if conversion is needed it might be best to work out how to do that first (or else this will be sitting in a holding pen for months). Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 13:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant to {{Infobox settlement}}. Also very ugly. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 23:35, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. Infobox settlement is very flexible and I'm in favor of getting rid of all regional/national varieties for a unified look. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 17:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ditched

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 01:47, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ditched (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I don't see how this can comply with our personality rights criteria " Before using this content, please ensure that you have the right to use it under the laws which apply in the circumstances of your intended use. " Dougweller (talk) 15:58, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On a less legally-wonky level, this isn't really the place to whine about getting dumped (especially if one's former beau is named elsewhere on the user page), and Wikipedia is not (yet) a full MySpace clone. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 13:30, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it I agree it was my mistake-Suyog ^{talk to me!} 05:59, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - of no real value to improving Wikipedia. At the very least, the image should be removed, but I don't think we need this template at all. Robofish (talk) 12:32, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a social club. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:13, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - If they want to say something so WP:NOTFACEBOOKy, they can make a template in their userspace. --The Σ ^talk_contribs 03:04, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Newport electoral ward

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Big Dom 17:26, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Newport electoral ward (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant localized template. The general electoral ward template should cover it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:27, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - overly specific and redundant to existing templates. Robofish (talk) 12:30, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I note that the other electoral ward templates in Category:Wales subdivision infobox templates have not been nominated. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:08, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- …yet. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 23:35, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 23:35, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Newport parish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Big Dom 17:28, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Newport parish (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant localized template. The infobox UK place should cover it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:27, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - overly specific and redundant to existing templates. Robofish (talk) 12:29, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant to {{Infobox settlement}}. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 23:35, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ilaiyaraaja Notable Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Big Dom 17:29, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ilaiyaraaja Notable Films (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Inappropriate template cluttering. The convention is not to have navigation boxes with the films of actors or music composers, only film directors. This composer has composed a massive number of compositions so the selection is purely subjective of what is "notable". ♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:44, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete - per nom. Shahid • ^Talk2me 14:48, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom, template clutter. Just add a list to the composer's article. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 17:06, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Shankar-Ehsaan-Loy Notable Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Big Dom 17:30, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Shankar-Ehsaan-Loy Notable Films (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

In articles related to Hindi cinema, we do not make templates for music directors. They make hundreds of soundracks which are almost impossible to include in one template. Secondly, this template is based on the user's personal opinion (he lists "notable" films). I think it's highly redundant. Shahid • ^Talk2me 05:32, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Only leads to template clutter with general template and director template.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:28, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support I disagree. I don't know what you mean by we. We do have such templates for Ilayaraja, for instance. As far as notable films go, there are some films without wikis. Hence the notable tag. Ravingranter (talk) 10:44, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS figures here. And it's good that you mentioned {{Ilaiyaraaja Notable Films}} - this one is not appropriate either, IMO. Shahid • ^Talk2me 10:46, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just because an article is missing is an extremely poor way to decide notability. We are missing millions of notable articles, an thousands of missing notable films..♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:47, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom, template clutter. Just add a list to the composer's article. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 17:06, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NJCC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 01:45, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NJCC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template has been superseded by this one, so NJCC is now orphaned. Kai445 (talk) 00:52, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Relinked something, so it's all good. MBisanz ^talk 01:16, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I saw the updated link, I like it. -Kai445 (talk) 02:31, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.