Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 January 18

< January 17	January 19 >

January 18

Template:On other projects

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 12:49, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:On other projects (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. Might be a test but not sure so nominating here for deletion rather than just G2. WOSlinker (talk) 22:57, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fb ground Stade Félix Bollaert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete, on very old orphan lists, appear to not have been in use in the past two years. WP:FOOTY was notified. Can be recreated if needed. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb ground Camp Nou (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb ground Guangdong Olympic Stadium (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb ground Home Depot Center (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb ground Lokomotiv Stadium (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb ground Macau Stadium (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb ground Municipal Stadium, Albufeira (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb ground Nösnäsvallen (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb ground Stade Félix Bollaert (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb ground Stadium of Light (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb ground Stanford Stadium (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb ground Tórsvøllur (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb ground UPC-Arena (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb ground Villa Park (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb ground Wembley (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary. Mhiji 23:32, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:37, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete they all seem empty and appear to serve no purpose. Eldumpo (talk) 08:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I fail to see why we even need to discuss the need to delete empty, unused templates. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 17:18, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not sure why you two are calling them "empty", they all have content. However, they are unused, and rather old, so delete. 134.253.26.10 (talk) 20:41, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Refer to the WikiProject since the class of templates presumably have a purpose, and these templates may well ensure that...
Keep used indirectly by Template:Fb cm1 match. Also there's no need to TfD this sort of template, they are not using valuable namespace, they are in a pseudo-namespace "Template:Fb ...." which does not present any namespace pollution problems for anyone outside the project. Rich Farmbrough, 23:04, 25th day of January in the year 2011 (UTC).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fb FA West Germany

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete, WP:FOOTY was notified. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:46, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb FA Austria (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb FA Belgium (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb FA Czechoslovakia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb FA England (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb FA France (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb FA Hungary (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb FA Italy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb FA Netherlands (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb FA Switzerland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fb FA West Germany (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. No longer necessary. Mhiji 23:16, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:37, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the category doesn't exist. Old and not in use, so delete. 134.253.26.10 (talk) 20:43, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Refer to Fb template specialists Again this is a complex set of templates we should not tamper with. Rich Farmbrough, 23:07, 25th day of January in the year 2011 (UTC).
- Who are the Fb template specialists? Have they been contacted? Airplaneman ✈ 13:16, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Did you know/Queue/doingcredits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 13:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know/Queue/doingcredits (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

See previous nomination. Appears to be somehow connected. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:07, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:22, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Did you know/Queue/credits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 13:08, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know/Queue/credits (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The purpose of this template is highly obscure. I would speedy this as a test page, but since it has various related pages, etc. this may have a good reason for existence. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:06, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:22, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Since no objections have been raised, I'd say this is pretty safe to delete, as is the other nomination above. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:24, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2007–08 Elitserien season by team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Airplaneman ✈ 13:06, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2007–08 Elitserien season by team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used, sea of red links. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:06, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:43, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it is used by the articles so far created. —KRM ^{(Communicate!)} 22:19, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Invalid nomination rationale; it is being used in some articles. Hey Mid (contribs) 12:14, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Different views on Satanism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 13:06, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Different views on Satanism (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not sure about this. Could be reworked as a general "Satanism" navbox, with material from Category:Satanism. On the other hand, I'm not sure how much of that stuff is actually relevant enough to have in a navbox, and this template as it stands is unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:56, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. That it's unused and its creator hasn't commented here to redeem it seems sufficient to me to delete it. --Bsherr (talk) 20:20, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Burr Steers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Airplaneman ✈ 13:03, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Burr Steers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only three films to their credit. WP:NENAN. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 02:27, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Three films in my opinion is enough for a template.--TheMovieBuff (talk) 18:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It has been determined that three films is not enough for a navbox like this. If the director directs a few more notable films in the future, the navbox can be recreated. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:25, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per TheMovieBuff. Hey Mid (contribs) 15:42, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Other people1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Other people3. Airplaneman ✈ 12:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Other people1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Hatnote, produces the same as {{Other people3}} (minor difference: the semicolon (irregular) vs. period). {{Other people3}} which has more options by parameters. {{Other people1|PERSON1}} → {{Other people1|PERSON1}} {{Other people3|PERSON1}} → {{Other people3|PERSON1}}. -DePiep (talk) 00:35, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 16:28, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. It's in use. --Bsherr (talk) 20:23, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Template:Other people3, as Template:Other people1 is in use. Hey Mid (contribs) 15:48, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy redirect. Rich Farmbrough, 23:12, 25th day of January in the year 2011 (UTC).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.