Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 August 29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 29

[edit]


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:50, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fnx (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Fnsx (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused magic word template of which similar alternatives have been deleted before. The Evil IP address (talk) 15:30, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:35, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Datelink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, doesn't appear to be useful. The Evil IP address (talk) 15:27, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's worse than unuseful. The template clearly goes against the current consensus not to link dates. JIMp talk·cont 01:20, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lightmouse (talk) 17:01, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:35, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DisputedVote (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Old template, no longer used. Generally, it suffices to use {{spa}} and {{Not a ballot}} when appropriate. The Evil IP address (talk) 15:20, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Merge, the {{Wikinewspar2}} template supports up to nine articles. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:50, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikinewspar3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikinewspar4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikinewspar5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All redundant to {{Wikinewspar2}}, should be replaced with that template, because it's heavily out-dated. The Evil IP address (talk) 14:58, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge merge them all for simplicity. JIMp talk·cont 02:33, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.