Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 August 29

< August 28	August 30 >

August 29

Template:Fnx

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:50, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fnx (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fnsx (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused magic word template of which similar alternatives have been deleted before. The Evil IP address (talk) 15:30, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Datelink

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:35, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Datelink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, doesn't appear to be useful. The Evil IP address (talk) 15:27, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's worse than unuseful. The template clearly goes against the current consensus not to link dates. JIMp_talk·cont 01:20, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lightmouse (talk) 17:01, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DisputedVote

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:35, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DisputedVote (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Old template, no longer used. Generally, it suffices to use {{spa}} and {{Not a ballot}} when appropriate. The Evil IP address (talk) 15:20, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete {{spa}} and {{not a ballot}} should be used only if there is no doubt that the user has made few or no other edits out side of the area. {{disputedvote}} opens speculation so this is not as functional.Curb Chain (talk) 21:28, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wikinewspar3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Merge, the {{Wikinewspar2}} template supports up to nine articles. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:50, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikinewspar3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Wikinewspar4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Wikinewspar5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All redundant to {{Wikinewspar2}}, should be replaced with that template, because it's heavily out-dated. The Evil IP address (talk) 14:58, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge merge them all for simplicity. JIMp_talk·cont 02:33, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.