Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 April 18
April 18
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:24, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Only used on a user page, could move to userspace or delete. Frietjes (talk) 19:06, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:24, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
template not in use, project inactive. Frietjes (talk) 19:02, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Pointless, purposeless. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 15:06, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Chris: if you need a copy userfied for "transmogrification", let me know. ;) JPG-GR (talk) 04:23, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Template not in use, broad in scope, and replaced by individual {{foo in topic}}
templates (see source). Frietjes (talk) 18:51, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. This is just plain stupid: it adds every country in the world to an article. It serves no purpose. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 14:47, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- In a way this is pretty useful, to find 2002-era unreferenced stubs of practically no encyclopedic value (hi, African Internet articles). I'm almost tempted to propose that this be kept and transmogrified into a tracking / cleanup template. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 21:29, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: It seems to be a collection of separate templates already in use. For example, Template:North_America_topic, the documentation of which already lists the other remaining country templates. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 17:50, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:21, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
I fail to see how grouping law schools by founding organization merits a navbox. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:56, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete It seems that this is merely a variation on a template previously deleted. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 17:52, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.