Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 November 4
| < November 3 | November 5 > |
|---|
November 4
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:50, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- Template:F2 driver (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused. Most driver articles are using the more generic {{Infobox racing driver}} instead. WOSlinker (talk) 23:40, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- Delete: This template is probably duplicate. WAYNEOLAJUWON 20:49, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom, unused. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 21:00, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Unused, seems redundant to the more generic infobox. PC78 (talk) 15:31, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Speedy Rich Farmbrough, 16:08, 4 November 2010 (UTC).
Orphan abandoned a couple hours after creation, in favor of per-year articles, over 4 years ago. I realize Wikipedia is not paper, but I don't think it's a compost bin for the detritus of abandoned projects either. 76.121.3.85 (talk) 01:57, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:48, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
No one in their right mind would use this template. I don't see any value in having it either. Alpha Quadrant talk 15:05, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- Creator notified Rich Farmbrough, 16:02, 4 November 2010 (UTC).
- Delete It's a rather amusing template. However, it has no transclusions and it not likely to have any transclusions. I don't think a banned user is going to want to advertise that fact with pride. Set Sail For The Seven Seas 345° 9' 15" NET 23:00, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- Ha. Delete though. These sorts of things should be in userspace if anywhere. PeterSymonds (talk) 17:50, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Lol. I really don't think anyone will use something like this. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 16:22, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.