Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 November 22

< November 21	November 23 >

November 22

Template:David Nail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:David Nail (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. Only navigates three articles. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 21:51, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - First off, that is only an essay, it isn't policy. Secondly, David Nail + I'm About to Come Alive + Red Light + Turning Home = 4, not 3. Third off, he is a popular country music artist who has released back to back top 20 hits this year, with more bound to come in the near future, which I believe is enough to warrant this template. Nowyouseemetalk2me 01:40, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - looks premature to me. I'd say wait until he releases a second album and another hit single or two. CloversMallRat (talk) 04:31, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, but I'd just like to point out this :) Nowyouseemetalk2me 01:00, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My, my, my, you're quite sneaky ;) EnDaLeCoMpLeX (contributions) • (let's chat) 16:50, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll point out this then. I'd also like to point out that the version of Bucky Covington's template you linked to is not the current, updated one. In time David Nail, hopefully, will have enough to match Covington's. CloversMallRat (talk) 19:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to argue with you, I just posted that link to that revision to show you that you created that template at that time with the same amount of info that David Nail's has now, which gives your delete rationale less credibility. Nowyouseemetalk2me 19:39, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I agree with Clovers. It is a bit premature at the time being. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (contributions) • (let's chat) 16:21, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Rehman 12:21, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Hot in Cleveland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:16, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hot in Cleveland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary template used in only two articles. Created when there were multiple character articles but these have been redirected back to the main article leaving just the series article and the episode list, both of which include links to each other in the body of the articles. AussieLegend (talk) 13:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. --Bsherr (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Hole (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Redirect Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:13, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hole (band) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant. {{Hole}} contains all the information and is more thorough. PS - I replaced the straggler Hole (band)s with Holes. Wikkitywack (talk) 10:24, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as redundant. --Bsherr (talk) 00:19, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- To explain, I am proposing that Template:Hole (band) become a redirect to Template:Hole so that pages employing Template:Hole (band) will transclude Template:Hole, and links to the former will point to the latter. --Bsherr (talk) 04:00, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- So this is a sort of stopgap procedure that happens if we can't find all the usages of {{Hole (band)}}? I found as many as I could and changed them to {{Hole}}. Shouldn't we just delete this? I doubt there are many more... (Don't we have a way of finding the stragglers?) Wikkitywack (talk) 20:56, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I say delete. Wikkitywack (talk) 00:58, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Blackbeard/Archive 1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Malformed nomination. NAC. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 17:14, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Blackbeard/Archive 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

original archive page, no longer required as cluebot created its own copy. Please delete. Parrot of Doom 09:32, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Railway line legend/NYCPT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:41, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Railway line legend/NYCPT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Very similar to the main Template:Railway line legend. don't think it's necessary to have a separate one. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 02:32, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I think the replacement is good enough. Rehman 12:23, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I might be missing something, but I can't see a significant enough difference from the main template to justify this. Junctions are shown differently and that's about it. Alzarian16 (talk) 21:27, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CenCo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:02, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CenCo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No useful transclusions in the mainspace, seems deprecated. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 05:22, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Rehman 05:45, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.