Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 November 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:47, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1974 Xenia Tornado Fatalities (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It's not a template, and it's not suitable for namespace Delete Secret account 23:30, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator/kept. –xenotalk 22:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Enough (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless template; appears unlikely to be used for anything other than leaving off-topic and uncivil comments on discussions, and is likely to simply attract further unconstructive comments on threads. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 08:36, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ref Bible (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template that duplicates the functionality of the zillion zillion Bible link templates. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 02:10, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral This was intended to provide easy access to multiple versions of a verse thus allowing articles to be NPOV in the links provided to the bible. This is unlike most Bible link templates that link to specific version favored by some denomination or group. However, it has not gained traction or been utilized widely so I don't oppose deletion. --Trödel 13:33, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
{{Bibleverse}} links to zillions of translations. For example, see Matthew 3:5. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 14:44, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
While Bibleverse can be used to link to many different translations it only links to one at a time. Thus, the editor decides where the link goes, and it does not provide options to the reader regarding translation, this template was intended to resolve that by linking to specific traditional or widely accepted translations and letting the reader click their preferred. --Trödel 15:40, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Uh... no? Bible verse links to several versions, and you can pick the one you want. See, as previously mentioned, the example of Matthew 3:5, which lists 75 versions of it. I don't know where you get the idea that it only links to one. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 23:38, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the "other" link in this template is a 404 Not Found error. Nyttend (talk) 14:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Convert to a wrapper template, and potentially rename. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:06, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cleanup-section (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, orphaned, and redundant. If there's some way to make it redirect to {{Cleanup|section}}, then I suggest that.

Note: Cannot be tagged for deletion, as it's protected.Justin (koavf)TCM02:09, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.