Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 November 16

< November 15	November 17 >

November 16

Template:Infobox Glastonbury

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per T3 and G7. matt (talk) 19:15, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Glastonbury (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox festival}}. Any missing fields could be added there. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 18:12, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Taiwan Station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Redirect Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:23, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Taiwan Station (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Duplicate of {{Infobox Taiwan station}}. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 17:58, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. If all the parameters match, we can just redirect the title over to the other template and be done with it. If not, fix the handful of pages that use this one and then redirect the title over. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:42, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Footballword

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete G7. Substantial content provided by one author Rambo's Revenge (talk) 17:57, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Footballword (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Failed proposal Gnevin (talk) 09:09, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per author request. WP:CSD#G7 should apply (only "substantial" content added by author), as the three other non-author edits were relatively minor. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 10:53, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: redundant to ensuring that an article's lead complies with the varient of English used, and has sufficient context if there can be any doubt. Probably not a G7 based on the other edits, but I see no reason for a long drawn-out deletion discussion when the author himself is requesting deletion in good faith. —W F C— 15:16, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. A failed proposal, good decision by proposer. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:17, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 17:46, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Film language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:21, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Film language (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary template. Unlikely to be used. Mhiji (talk) 05:18, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused, and unlikely to be used any time soon... SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:20, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.