Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 May 4

< May 3	May 5 >

May 4

Template:Aragonese dialect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused and no objection to deletion. RL0919 (talk) 01:32, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Aragonese dialect (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox language}}, which I used to replace this template on about four pages. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:51, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tramlink Lines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused and no objection to deletion. RL0919 (talk) 01:31, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tramlink Lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:28, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Case Western Reserve Spartans football coach navbox + other identical cases

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 18:21, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Case Western Reserve Spartans football coach navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Endicott_Power_Gulls_football_coach_navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) - Exact same case with this one, only one red link, orphaned. - Mobius Clock 15:48, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Huntingdon Hawks football coach navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:MIT Engineers football coach navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:North Carolina Wesleyan Battling Bishops football coach navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Rockford Regents football coach navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Salve Regina Seahawks football coach navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Thomas More Saints football coach navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) - More of the same from the same category, all orphans and containing only redlinks. - Mobius Clock 15:55, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, all navbox links lead to non-existent pages. - Mobius Clock 15:43, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. Even if they were blue links, succession boxes would be preferable, imo. Resolute 03:45, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply. I'm not going to argue to keep these navboxes. I just wanted to comment that you are part of the tiny minority on Wikipedia who thinks succession boxes are better than navboxes when it comes to award winners and coaches. So, even if they were blue links, your comment about succession boxes is irrelevant to this discussion because these were brought to TfD with the concern that they were all red-linked, not because Mobius Clock thinks succession boxes would be better. I'm not going to check this anymore so don't bother replying. Jrcla2 (talk) 03:31, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Burger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 18:18, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Burger (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, seems to serve only as a way of formatting talk page messages. Redundant to simply using wikitables if such formatting is really required. - Mobius Clock 15:36, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ╟─Treasury Tag►Lord Speaker─╢ 17:22, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to have been missed following the related discussion on {{Launchballer}} (and indeed {{talkbubble}}). Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 17:28, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ugh. Delete per WP:DONTBEOBNOXIOUS. Reso lute 03:47, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete extremely ugly. 70.29.208.247 (talk) 04:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FootballIDRIVEpast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:56, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FootballIDRIVEpast (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Drive itself is defunct; little need to inform people about its previous runs on talk pages with a banner. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:36, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Associated project page has been marked as historical for more than two years. --RL0919 (talk) 01:42, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Charleston Campaign

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused and no objection to deletion. RL0919 (talk) 00:51, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Charleston Campaign (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigational box for two articles that have both been deleted; consequently, entirely useless. Nyttend (talk) 00:26, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Past Simpsons character

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused and no objection to deletion. RL0919 (talk) 00:49, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Past Simpsons character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template, most likely redundant to something else, e.g., {{Infobox character}}. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:11, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Argplot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 00:46, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Argplot (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This article template only serves as a disclamier ViperSnake151 Talk 00:02, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, while this isn't one of the types of disclaimer templates that is speediable, it's really not useful. How many people are likely to read an article about an alternate reality and believe that it's real? Nyttend (talk) 00:29, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Argh. This looks like an explicit attempts at an end-run around the policy on in-universe material. No surprise that the three current articlespace transclusions are dreadfully low-quality articles. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 09:24, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, manages to violate WP:NDIA and WP:PLOT at once. Stifle (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.