Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 February 8

< February 7	February 9 >

February 8

Template:Jedward

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:14, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jedward (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Someone just created this navigational template for a duo who have only released one single. All other links in the template are loosely related. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:15, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - severely underpopulated. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 21:16, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AE-nav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:14, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AE-nav (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I'm nominating this template to be deleted following the deletion of the majority of the articles linked to in this template. With only two of the articles in the template (likely) to be kept, I see little reason to keep a navbox for the company. Izno (talk) 17:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Was about to nominate it myself. Pcap ping 17:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Semxlit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Semxlit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, easily replaced in few transculsions. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:14, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indifferent, as creator. - Gilgamesh (talk) 13:58, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:14, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Izno (talk) 00:31, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Navigation with image

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete and redirect Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:57, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Navigation with image (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, can be easily replaced in its few transculsions. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:39, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:04, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, deprecated, {{Navbox}} also supports much more parameters. --The Evil IP address (talk) 21:54, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Europe (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Europe (disambiguation) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete Unused in article and WP space; seems useless/pointless. Cybercobra (talk) 15:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 04:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Taoism portal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was subst and delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 20:05, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Taoism portal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant of {{Portal}}, unless there is something I am missing. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:46, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Portal does not define the graphic used (default is a jigsaw puzzle piece) for the portal template, so this allows editors a way to specify a particular look for the portal box. There are a lot of "standardized" pictures used on lots of portalbox links through specific portal templates, atleast last time I looked. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 05:24, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Did you check the source of the template? Image is the second parameter to {{portal}}. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 21:33, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Did you read what I wrote? (why would I say "default" instead of "only", if I didn't mean that?) 70.29.210.242 (talk) 06:36, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - What does the default image have to do with anything? 81.111.114.131 (talk) 14:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      - It's what you're harping on. I did says something about the image choice, you complained about the image parameter, I mentioned that I did say something about the image choice, and you ask why I mention it? 70.29.210.242 (talk) 08:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        I wondered why you mentioned it in the first place. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 13:48, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        
        A wonderful example of disputation, my friends. --Ancheta Wis (talk) 13:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per IP's usability argument --Cybercobra (talk) 12:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I think it's got the right to stay. Kayau Odyssey HUCK FINN to the lighthouse 13:35, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Subst/delete - redundant to {{portal}}, as evidenced by the template code itself: {{Portal|Taoism|Taijitu red.PNG|45}} 81.111.114.131 (talk) 21:33, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete per 81.111.114.131. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 13:03, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete per above. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Ancheta Wis (talk) 13:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete. As discussed above, this is {{Portal}} with a specific image, which hardly requires a distinct template. --RL0919 (talk) 17:27, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Sit Down, Shut Up

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy as a (failed) testpage. Debresser (talk) 00:19, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Sit Down, Shut Up (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A template for a failed Fox animated series that is already covered by Infobox Television quite nicely. The entire template is broken and I don't understand why we would ever create an infobox for one television series. Nate • (chatter) 09:07, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Editnotices/Page/Template:2010 FIFA World Cup qualification - UEFA Group Stage (2nd place)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted by PrimeHunter (talk · contribs) per WP:CSD#G7. RL0919 (talk) 12:24, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Editnotices/Page/Template:2010 FIFA World Cup qualification - UEFA Group Stage (2nd place) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Housekeeping reason. The WC qualification stage has finished for three months already. I don't think there would be more major edit here. Raymond "Giggs" Ko 06:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, I request for a new editnotice template for the Template:UEFA Euro 2012 qualification (2nd place), i.e. Template:Editnotices/Page/Template:UEFA Euro 2012 qualification (2nd place). I suggest to copy this template but replacing the FIFA World Cup information into UEFA Euro 2012. Raymond "Giggs" Ko 06:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. I created this and am the only contributor but it is no longer needed. I have deleted it per WP:CSD#G7 after using the code in Template:Editnotices/Page/Template:UEFA Euro 2012 qualification (2nd place) with the rules link replaced. I haven't closed a TfD and will leave that for somebody else. PrimeHunter (talk) 11:33, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PBS Sprout Specials

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete per T2 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:53, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PBS Sprout Specials (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Malformatted; simply {{Navbox}} with no additional information, hasn't been edited since January 16, 2010. RJaguar3 | u | t 01:11, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.