Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 August 8

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 8

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. fetch·comms 00:48, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Citation needed - Kent (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{citation needed}}. If WikiProject Kent needs to find articles with fact issues, then CatScan is the better tool.[1]

Note: if deleted, then Category:WikiProject Kent Citation needed needs to be deleted. -— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 13:39, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. fetch·comms 00:57, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Promo singles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. Relatively recent fork of {{singles}}, the only difference here is that the text "Singles" has been changed to "Promo singles". I'm inclined to regard such information as peripheral and see this template as adding unnecessary clutter to the main album infobox. On the other hand, I don't see why {{singles}} couldn't adequately be used in any situations where the information was deemed relevant. Either way, I don't see a genuine need for this template. PC78 (talk) 12:22, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as redundant. JPG-GR (talk) 01:56, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Category:Continents (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. Seems to be a copy of Template:Category Continents which is also up for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 11:35, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 02:47, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Category Continents (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. Redundant to the category system. Only used on categories. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 11:32, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. fetch·comms 01:26, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Polish noble (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant, Template:Infobox Nobility can be used - will request that a CoA field be implemented into Infobox nobility. Connormahtalk 02:03, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. fetch·comms 01:06, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Polish monarch (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to Template:Infobox royalty Connormahtalk 02:25, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.