Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 August 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 6

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. fetch·comms 02:46, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Frederik Du Chau (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only directed three films. WP:NENAN. Three is almost always too small for a navbox. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 21:33, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Templates are a great way to easily link to other relevant pages. Although this director has thus far only done 3 films, they should be readily available to any reader. There is no need to delete this page. Adding “see also” or something like that just seems silly when the director template is so accessible.Donmike10 (talk) 16:42, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - it may only link to three films, but it has four links overall. I would say it is easier than putting a "see also" section. Airplaneman 04:55, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral There's already a table within the director's article linking to all the movies. I would also note that if the table is right, the template is incomplete. On the other hand, which articles actually need the box? All the movies either do or should link to the director; the director appears to link to every movie, so why do we need the navbox? On the third hand, WP:NENAN's rule of five suggests that five movies (plus the director's article) is enough. --NYKevin @207, i.e. 03:58, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Navigation template based on an obsolete classification. RL0919 (talk) 16:43, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UEFA 5-star stadia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

UEFA no longer uses the five-star rating system, as shown at UEFA stadium categories. This navbox is therefore obsolete. – PeeJay 11:31, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.