Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 July 27

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 27

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 23:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Patient safety organizations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Inappropriate "template" of nothing but external links; used only one two articles Patient safety and Patient safety organization, and seems be being used in a highly inappropriate fashion. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 22:35, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect JPG-GR (talk) 04:57, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Michigan Wolverines athletic teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is redundant based on the "athletics" section of Template:University of Michigan. Again, I suggest a merge and redirect. Muboshgu (talk) 14:05, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect. JPG-GR (talk) 04:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MichiganBasketballCoach (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is redundant based on the existence of Template:Michigan Wolverines basketball. I suggest a merge and redirect. Muboshgu (talk) 13:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7 author request and unanimous opinion here. Amalthea 20:51, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uw-cite (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Horribly misguided template, going against some of our basic policies. "However, adding citation templates are considered disruptive edits and are disliked by the community."? Umm, no, citation tags are one of the basic cleanup tools: adding uncited text is the problem, not pointing out these problems. The template continues by pointing the templated reader to "disruptive editing". We don't need templates which go against our core policies. Fram (talk) 09:46, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. In additon to the problems pointed out by Fram, the template could easily be read to mean that using templates such as {{cite book}} or {{citation}} constitutes disruptive editing, and by extension, citing sources in any way, shape, or form constitutes disruptive editing. This template is a case of forbidding a particular tree, while forgetting that the reader of the template is looking at a forest. --Jc3s5h (talk) 12:50, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as above; do note that the author of the template means {{citation needed}} — see here. Still a very Bad Idea™ — Cheers, Jack Merridew
  • Delete - This dangerous template discourages the enforcement the WP:Verifiability policy, which is one of our core policies. EconomistBR 17:45, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*Comment Yes, I know that it is badly worded, but can anyone figure out a better wording? The creation comes out of people using the fact tag obnoxiously. I would appreciate any help with this. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:00, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as orphaned and per recent discussions on the plentiful 1632-related templates. JPG-GR (talk) 04:50, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:32TOC-beg (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Inappropriate template that was used to create full copies of works' TOC with links to sections; i.e. what a normal TOC does. This served to cement a whole lot of franchise spam into Wikipedia and present an impenetrable template syntax to wiki-editors. Now orphaned. Cheers, Jack Merridew 06:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:32st (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:32st/doc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:32s (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:32color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

associated w/{{32TOC-beg}} and was used to create/colour part of the tables. now orphaned and highly inappropriate. Cheers, Jack Merridew 06:42, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.