Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 January 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 7

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete --User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 08:38, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dirt (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary template for three items, the series, a character list and an episode list. There were individual character articles as well but I redirected them for lack of any independent notability. All three pages are interlinked. Otto4711 (talk) 23:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Redirect to {{copyedit}} --Magioladitis (talk) 11:51, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Grammar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to copyedit and its for parameter, also {{spelling}} was tfded. Ipatrol (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete per nom.--Witticism (talk) 01:27, 8 January 2009 (UTC) vandalism-only account that was making edits to get auto-confirmed --Enric Naval (talk) 01:15, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Swaminarayan Temple List

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletion of all. RyanGerbil10(Four more years!) 06:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple template nomination.


Not a template. Has trivial content about 1 specific temple each. Was used only in 1 page and has been substituted into the page. Hence delete these templates. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 12:31, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I made these templates specifically for the Swaminarayan temples page - modeled on List of temples of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I dint know this was the wrong way of going about this. Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 04:44, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was G2 as test page. Template was broken and never would've been used anyway. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 14:35, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Code Lyoko character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox character}}. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 03:40, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Considering the template page is currently broken, the consensus that none of the characters are notable enough for their own page (see this AfD), and that all but two of the links redirect to a main character page (the other two have recently been recreated by a single user ignoring the consensus, and both use the generic character infobox anyway), I don't believe this infobox would ever be used. If consensus on character notability were to change, the generic {{Infobox character}} would be more useful. Bettia (rawr!) 11:34, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.