Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 November 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 7

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --WoohookittyWoohoo! 10:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cinemabycountry (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused with no significant edits since its creation two years ago. The single talk page transclusion suggets that this was intended as a sort of meta-template for the contents of Category:Film country templates, but there's no evidence that it was ever finished or used, nor do I think that the idea is worth pursuing now. Suggest subst & delete.PC78 (talk) 21:55, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --WoohookittyWoohoo! 10:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProjectworldcinema (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and obsolete navtemplate; redundant to {{Filmsbycountry}}. PC78 (talk) 21:42, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --WoohookittyWoohoo! 10:09, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Spears family (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template really isn't needed. All but a few of the links in it are redirects anyway and don't have articles of their own, and all of the non-redirect links are already included in Template:Britney Spears. Save-Me-Oprah(talk) 18:35, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Moon (Sunrise) 20:59, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was 'delete --WoohookittyWoohoo! 10:07, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:South African cricket competitions in 1971-72 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. Orphaned and redundant template. All the articles it points to have been deleted. WP:CRIC has no further use for it. ---BlackJack | talk page 14:28, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.