Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 June 24

< June 23	June 25 >

June 24

Template:FFIII

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 00:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FFIII (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There are only two articles, no need for a template. — Kariteh (talk) 19:58, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not enough content to warrant a template, in its current state. --Oscarthecat (talk) 21:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the whole series of FFI to FFMCLXVWXYZ-1 templates into main FF template. Otherwise, delete because the goal of the template can be accomplished with 2 links. --Thetrick (talk) 21:11, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I assume your first suggestion was a joke since the numbered games actually go up to XIII. The main FF template (Template:Final Fantasy) is pretty crowded already so subtemplates are definitely warranted, though not in the case of FIII. Kariteh (talk) 21:23, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Kariteh, no merge.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 03:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - entirely unnecessary as a template. Terraxos (talk) 01:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Andoverexeter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 00:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Andoverexeter (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Sports rivalry template that is almost empty. 1 use on a user page. Thetrick (talk) 02:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, pretty useless. Stifle (talk) 13:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Appanoose County Courthouse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 00:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Appanoose County Courthouse (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Utterly pointless template that I've replaced. (Could G1 apply for things like this?) Thetrick (talk) 02:16, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, article (or possibly just text fragment) created in template namespace. Stifle (talk) 13:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Anti box

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 00:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anti box (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Userbox for a wikiproject the creator has since abandoned. Unused. Thetrick (talk) 02:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Stifle (talk) 13:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Probably qualifies as WP:CSD#G6, Non-controversial maintenance. -- Ned Scott 09:39, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Anticrash discussion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 00:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anticrash discussion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Some kind of user_talk message box. 1 use. Thetrick (talk) 02:01, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unuseful joke message template. Stifle (talk) 13:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I subst'ed the one use. -- Ned Scott 09:40, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Anon-sig

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete (have been userfied to User:The Bipolar Anon-IP Gnome/Anon sig) - Nabla (talk) 19:01, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anon-sig (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Looks like a test page, but not quite sure. Probably duplicates better anon-greeting templates. Thetrick (talk) 01:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Userfy _{(See below.)} - Since this is a substantiated template, you cannot see how often it has been used since 2008-02-18 when I created it ... check the edit histories of my recent IP accounts and you'll see that it is used on Talk pages ... also, it's a courtesy to inform the author of a TfD instead of expecting them to have it on a Watchlist ... Happy Editing! — 151.200.237.53 (talk · contribs) _{11:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)}[reply]
Delete, not useful template. Stifle (talk) 13:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If not for the TFD message being part of the substantiation now, I would have used it at least a dozen times in the past hour while adding {{Flag-article}} and {{Selected filmography}} messages!! (Something I discovered while leaving the comment above ... I had to edit it to remove the TFD message. <Sigh!>) — 151.200.237.53 (talk) 13:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wrapped the template in <noinclude> tags, as advised at the top of the page. The TfD notice won't be substituted any more. Cenarium ^Talk 14:40, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thnx! Happy Editing! — 151.200.237.53 (talk · contribs) _{16:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)}[reply]

Comment I think Wikipedia:Signatures#Transclusion of templates is relevant here, though, if this template had been located in userspace I wouldn't have noticed it. --Thetrick (talk) 22:14, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy or delete, I certainly wouldn't use this sig template as an anon, it includes a specific sign-off that I think is corny. 70.55.84.202 (talk) 05:43, 28 June 2008 (UTC) — 70.55.84.202 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. .[reply]
Userfy, if the template's function can be preserved that way (keep if it can't). I'm not sure anyone besides the IP Gnome uses this template, but I know he -does- use it, and he's a long established editor. He should be able to keep it, but if it can go in userspace, it should be there --UsaSatsui (talk) 23:18, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Query: Just how would one userfy this template? Happy Editing! — 151.200.237.53 (talk · contribs) _{02:16, 4 July 2008 (UTC)}[reply]
- D'oh! Could it be as simple as copying it to User:The Bipolar Anon-IP Gnome/Anon sig? — 151.200.237.53 (talk) 02:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Done OK, {{subst:User:The Bipolar Anon-IP Gnome/Anon sig|151.200.237.53}} is tres ugly, but it does work ... is this what you meant by "moving it to userspace"? — 151.200.237.53 (talk) 02:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Yep. I mean, you get a use out of it (since you use IPs, you can't have a custom sig), it's not in templatespace, everyone is happy. Right? Can this be closed as moot? --UsaSatsui (talk) 04:14, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close - As per above discussion, I have userfied this template for my own personal use. :-) Happy Editing! — 151.200.237.53 (talk · contribs) _{03:04, 5 July 2008 (UTC)}[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Anon-vf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was redirect to ~~{{welcome3}}~~ {{Welcome-anon}} (previous redirects here) - Nabla (talk) 18:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anon-vf (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

User-built warning page for anonyIps. Appears unused. Thetrick (talk) 01:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to {{welcome3}} in case some people are actually using it. Stifle (talk) 13:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tviv

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Generally same template as a formerly deleted one Woohookitty^Woohoo! 13:24, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tviv (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This seems to have a similar purpose and the same name as a previously deleted template Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_February_1#Template:Tviv_and_Template:Tviv_this. FYI, 7 articles use it. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 11:53, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per CSD:G4. Stifle (talk) 13:08, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it passed the inclusion criteria for the m:interwiki map, and last TfD was two years ago. -- Ned Scott 09:45, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep From a brief glance at the front page the linked site appears operate under an open-source-ish license, so the interwiki link seems reasonable. --Thetrick (talk) 23:20, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete CSD:G4 and, despite that is a 2 year old discussion, the reasons to delete stated there still stand, IMO. - Nabla (talk) 18:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing has changed since the last TFD. Garion96 (talk) 20:13, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Woohookitty^Woohoo! 13:24, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]