Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 June 22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 22

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Happymelon 20:44, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CCD (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Userpage message box for deleted project Thetrick (talk) 23:25, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete - unused and unusable. Happymelon 20:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tinyurl (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Previous TfD try didn't make it to the discussion page. Unused. Thetrick (talk) 20:36, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete - redundant to {{tlx}} etc, and unused. Happymelon 20:42, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tnw (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Previous TfD try didn't make it to the discussion page. Unused. Thetrick (talk) 20:35, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Happymelon 20:37, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Single cover (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Duplicate of {{Non-free album cover}}. It doesn't meet the naming requirements for non-free copyright tags, so it's not a candidate for redirecting. —-Carnildo (talk) 20:30, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete - survived from Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 March 18#Postcode templates Happymelon 20:40, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PostcodeSS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Previous TfD try didn't make it to the discussion page. Thetrick (talk) 20:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete - redundant, unused, useless. Happymelon 20:28, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:National Republican/meta/color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Previous TfD try didn't make it to discussion page. Thetrick (talk) 20:12, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The edit summary from the previous nomination was (Template is wrong color and duplicates the existing National Republican Party (United States)/meta/color template). No transclusions, 1 link from a user talk page. --Thetrick (talk) 12:51, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete - redundant, borderline G1. Happymelon 20:26, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PPortal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Previous TfD try didn't make it to the discussion page. Thetrick (talk) 20:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This appears to be a metatemplate, apparently to do with the portal namespace in some way, but it has no current transclusions or incoming links to suggest or explain any current uses (it simply returns the passed parameter, and does nothing else). Looked at the creating user's contribs for around the time they created this, but was unable to find any additional context that way. In the event this does have some use, it should be replaced with {{Echo}}. – Luna Santin (talk) 04:38, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete per G10. While it is true that this is directed towards a bot, it is obviously a reflection of the bots operator. This isn't appropriate, doesn't help improve the encyclopedia, and has been deleted. Also, CSD#T1 applies here, as it is in the Template: namespace. Rjd0060 (talk) 16:03, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Betacommandbot hater (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Rude. Potentially WP:CSD#G10 but I suppose could be userfy-ed. 2 uses on 2 user pages. Thetrick (talk) 17:34, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Happymelon 20:24, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anson Hu (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Bio template for one person. Can't find exact parent template. 1 use in 1 article. Thetrick (talk) 17:03, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Happymelon 20:19, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Boring (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, potentially insulting. Thetrick (talk) 06:11, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. I also G11'ed the article :D Happymelon 20:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BlackPublicMedia.org (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Plain text that is duplicated in the article. Pointless. Thetrick (talk) 05:38, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Happymelon 20:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Aiw (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Logo for Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians. Old, seems unused. Thetrick (talk) 04:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted under CSD G7. Kubek15 (Sign!) (Contribs) (UBX) 09:59, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Best Continent (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Blank, unused template (is there a speedy category for this?) Thetrick (talk) 00:06, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.