Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 June 11

< June 10	June 12 >

June 11

Template:VIZ company (Press Releases)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 12:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:VIZ company (Press Releases) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary template. Press releases already cited by {{cite press release}} and there is no valid reason to just put a press release in the External Links instead of using it as a reference if it adds anything to an article. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:13, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete XD I had to think about this one for a bit, but your final comment makes sense to me. External link to company website? Yes. Company website press release? Clutter. Liashi (talk) 21:27, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Shueisha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep. Wizardman 12:53, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Shueisha (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Inappropriate and unnecessary "template". Words kind of escape me on its current state (as a note, it has since been reverted to an earlier version, but the deletion reason still stands). Regardless, Shueisha is one of the biggest publishers in Japan. A template of their works is not an good use of a template at all. It would be like making a template with every book published by Random House. Far better handled by the existing Category:Shueisha. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the number of works is indeed very large, making a category better suited for this. -- Ned Scott 04:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. While I would have voted to delete the pre-cleanup version of this template in a heartbeat, the current one doesn't look half bad. It's definitely useful as a navigation tool between the company's magazines.--Nohansen (talk) 06:35, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep If the table is defaulted to hide, it is a pretty good template. Samuel Sol (talk) 15:01, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Deleting templates does not solve any pressing problems and this is a reasonable, useful template. --Dragon695 (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Split or Keep Split? Keep? I'm not too sure which is better. Although I originally created the template, I am surprised by the horribly disorganized mess it had become, as I hadn't created it in order to make such a far-reaching monster. The old version you cited especially looks more like a list than a template. After looking at the history since creation, I realize why. It was moved to include all of Shueisha's magazine media, while I created it only to cover their manga magazines. I would suggest that if it is too list-like it be split into sub-templates: Manga Magazines and Magazines (with Hitotsubashi Group being a sub-category within both templates.) The reason I originally created it wasn't to cover everything, which, as you pointed out, is better suited to the category feature...which isn't being properly used, unfortunately. I created it because Shueisha didn't have a template for it's various types of manga magazines as other companies did (Shogakukan for example), and I found it hard to navigate between them when trying to find out about them as related works. I designed it for ease of navigation between magazines related by the topic of MANGA...not just a general company name. In any case, if the majority of people like/want/need/approve the ability to navigate between just manga magazines as well as other types without going to a category page, by all means we should keep it as-is. The addition of website links and the Japanese, however, are clearly abusing the template, and I am glad that the current version has removed them. That sort of information belongs on the articles for the company/magazines themselves. Liashi (talk) 01:27, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TMTC web

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 12:54, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TMTC web (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template that implements and external link. Thetrick (talk) 08:03, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It appears the template is nothing but a spamlink. If I am right, it qualifies for a G11, so speedy delete as blatant spam, unless someone else objects. --Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 23:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Multi-file start

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 12:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Multi-file start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Test template with 1 use on user page. Thetrick (talk) 08:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Common French surnames in Puerto Rico

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 12:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Common French surnames in Puerto Rico (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

List or table masquerading as template. 1 use in an article. Thetrick (talk) 07:58, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Also not used --T-rex 23:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PleaseseeDRV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 12:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PleaseseeDRV (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template for controversial user page deletions? Not used. Thetrick (talk) 07:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:EW50

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was withdrawn. Wizardman 12:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EW50 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template with 1 instance in creator's user pages. Thetrick (talk) 07:42, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It is substituted, which is why it won't show in "What Links Here". I (the creator) have used it excactly 50 times, obviously.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 12:35, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I withdraw the nomination, though it would be terribly helpful if you put the template in some category or another. --Thetrick (talk) 12:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Indefblockedipbecause

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Wizardman 12:57, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Indefblockedipbecause (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template that is unlikely to ever be used, we, in practice, rarely, if ever, indef block IP's, and I don't see any use for this template. Steve Crossin (talk)(email) 04:44, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Delete. We already have the indef blocked IP template anyways, so I will agree with Steve that there is no need for this template. NHRHS2010 | Talk to me 20:41, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Things like tor nodes, open proxies, and colo IPs are sometimes blocked indef. So it does have some use. MBisanz ^talk 06:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- In fact, we do have an Template:Indefblockedip template. NHRHS2010 | Talk to me 00:42, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per MBisanz. While it's somewhat redundant, it still has some use, such as for WP:NOPs. --Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 23:58, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I checked the use of this template, and it seems it isn't used on any pages at all. That's the reason I nominated it for deletion. Steve Crossin (talk)(email) 04:13, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is because it is a subst'd template that should never have any linked uses. MBisanz ^talk 21:58, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep agreeing with MBisanz' first comment. However, I would not object to having (if it' possible) the template merged with and re-directed to Template:Indefblockedip. Acalamari 16:36, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Actually the devs have indicated against indef blocking IPs [1]. MBisanz ^talk 00:24, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Acalamari 16:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Blockedtroll

Template:Blockedtroll (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template, derivitave of {{Indefblockeduser}}, seems there's no reason for this template, at all, and is unlikely to be used. Steve Crossin (talk)(email) 04:42, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Steve, we'll just use indefblockeduser template anyways. NHRHS2010 | Talk to me 20:42, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per DENY. MBisanz ^talk 08:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Just use {{indefblockeduser}} or another useful variant. --Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 00:00, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Di-no source-caption

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 12:51, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Di-no source-caption (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. Might have been a test page. Also has a doc page. Thetrick (talk) 00:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Superseded by {{Db}}. Kubek15^{(Sign!) (Contribs) (UBX)} 10:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fb team abb Sporting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 12:51, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb team abb Sporting (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template that includes 1 wikilink. Might have been the start of a navbox. 1 article and 2 userpage instances. Thetrick (talk) 00:27, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I spoke too soon on this. There's a whole forest of these bitsy templates out there being built by some football project, and this one just happened to have been tagged as uncategorized (though the other I looked at didn't have a category). Still, only one article use. --Thetrick (talk) 00:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FPArchiveBarOctober2005

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 12:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FPArchiveBarOctober2005 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Old POTD archive nav template. Appears to be unused. Thetrick (talk) 00:23, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - clearly no longer necessary. Terraxos (talk) 01:25, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:First Great Western color

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 12:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:First Great Western color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template for a color code. Thetrick (talk) 00:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

notification left at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains. Slambo (Speak) 12:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Delete, will be superseded by {{National Rail colour}}. Mackensen (talk) 13:14, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Mackensen. NHRHS2010 | Talk to me 20:43, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Mackensen's vote. Kubek15^{(Sign!) (Contribs) (UBX)} 10:27, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete per CSD A2. Kubek15^{(Sign!) (Contribs) (UBX)} 10:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hoofdpagina/Rechterkolom einde

Template:Hoofdpagina/Rechterkolom einde (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Test template in a foreign language. Thetrick (talk) 00:14, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete per CSD A2. Kubek15^{(Sign!) (Contribs) (UBX)} 10:32, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hoofdpagina/Projecten

Template:Hoofdpagina/Projecten (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Test template in a foreign language. Thetrick (talk) 00:13, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.