Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 June 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 1

[edit]


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete Happymelon 19:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Life in Brazil (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Initially created to be a brazilian version of Template:Life in the United States, but there aren't enouth important pages (like Educational attainment in Brazil, Household income in Brazil, Homeownership in Brazil and others) to make it really necessary. Actually is not only a template with a lot of red links, but a redundant and poor version of Template:Brazil topicsGuilherme (t/c) 22:11, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete Happymelon 19:19, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProjectU2TV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Orphaned template, never used on any other page. –Dream out loud (talk) 03:47, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete Happymelon 19:38, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Visual3D.NET/to do (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Claims to be a template but is actually a user's to do list for an article that has since been deleted as blatant advertising . LegoTech·(t)·(c) 00:57, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete Happymelon 19:42, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canadian Idol winners (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Redundant to Template:Canadian Idol. Euroleague (talk) 00:54, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep, or at least 'redesign'. The template should be renamed ("Infobox" is not correct) and it may need some more work, but certainly no consensus to delete. Happymelon 19:44, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox largest cities (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This is very redundant and unnecessary to have a template in a template page that was specifiably made for this reason. — NuclearVacuum 20:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is just that? If this is the problem, we will start using this code directly in the articles, you help me? Felipe C.S ( talk ) 20:26, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.