Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 July 19

< July 18	July 20 >

July 19

Template:Guinness World Records books

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete, as the individual articles were deleted/redirected - Nabla (talk) 22:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Guinness World Records books (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template lists annual editions of the Guinness World Records book and was presumably intended to link to articles on individual editions. Problem is, only two such articles exist: one is a redirect, and the other one is the subject of a current AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guinness world records, 2009. — Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 20:28, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It's premature for this template to exist if there's nothing to apply it to, and it also doesn't look like there will be any time soon if ever. -- Atama ^chat 17:28, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Urban Dictionary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Close. The AfD for this mis-nomination was closed as keep. Non-admin close. --Thetrick (talk) 03:50, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Urban Dictionary (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Self-publicity/irrelevant — 201.212.199.133 (talk) 18:54, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is actually a mis-listed AfD nom for Urban Dictionary. --Thetrick (talk) 19:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Three Kingdoms warning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete - Nabla (talk) 22:29, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Three Kingdoms warning (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused non-standard article talk header template. --Thetrick (talk) 11:32, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ThredboClubLodges

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete - Nabla (talk) 22:26, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ThredboClubLodges (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and incomplete template that links to two redirects and a page that is close to Advert. --Thetrick (talk) 11:25, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Punkmorten (talk) 10:15, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Thomas Huxley Racial Definitions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete - Nabla (talk) 22:18, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Thomas Huxley Racial Definitions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template for an entirely out-of date theory. --Thetrick (talk) 11:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.