Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 June 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 6

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:17, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Premature Edit (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Anti-wiki, by telling people not to edit, unencyclopaedic tone, and unused. —-Rory096 23:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. Harryboyles 04:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox OrigDam (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary fix, no longer used. Creator agrees, at User talk:LymanSchool#Infobox OrigDam. — Andy Mabbett 21:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The Gathering templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:20, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox The Gathering (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:The Gathering (computer party) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete - Unused templates which seem to not have been modified since the date of their creation nearly 2 months ago. —- After Midnight 0001 18:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteThis is a pretty much single-use template (for two articles), and since it is not in use, I fully endorse the deletion. Evilclown93 20:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Delete Single use templates thats not in use should be deleted. Urdna 02:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:49, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LongSynopsis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unused, and probably good that it isn't. It can't be good to have two synopses written in one article. — fuzzy510 06:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Templates like this are the purpose for templates... WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:23, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Brokeback Mountain (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

On its own, it may be fine, but as a matter of precedent I'd think that we can't have templates created for individual movies simply because of how excessive it could get. — fuzzy510 05:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: there's separated pages for the 2 lead characters, a short story, a soundtrack, parodies, critical reception --SuperHotWiki 06:41, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Articles that cannot exist without the Matrix series transclude the template (e.g. the 3 movies, the characters)
  • Articles that can exist without the Matrix series do not transclude the template (e.g. the actors)
And the template in question seems to follow this pattern too. It has been transcluded by a handful of articles. If I'm interested in a character of a movie, I would probably be interested in other characters and the director too. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 09:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.