Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 July 14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 14

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Mike Peel 20:32, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox DefunctNHLTeam (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Redundant template since Template:NHL Team was modified to replace it. — NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 21:07, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Template:Uw-delete3 as a test page. SalaSkan 13:37, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:B3 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This is not really a template, its just like a warning on a users talk page. Rlest 19:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was boldly redirected to {{uw-ad3}} as an obvious duplicate page. SalaSkan (Review me) 02:14, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Advert3 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Template is an unnecessary duplicate of Template:uw-spam3. Rlest 19:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would say delete and redirect to {{spam3}}. The two are nearly identical; they can be fused without any significant problems. The Evil Spartan 20:08, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deleted by template's creator. IronGargoyle 04:41, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Imageow3 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This is a bit of a useless template, you cannot upload images to Wikipedia under the same name and there is the regular templates such as {{uw-vandalism1}}.. Rlest 19:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, the uploader's been around since Feb 2002. Ahem, I mean, rewrite to be less specific - just have it be a template warning against uploading over another image period. The Evil Spartan 20:11, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedily deleted as housekeeping. mattbr 10:42, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject African Union (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unused template for a defunct WikiProject. — PC78 13:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Mike Peel 20:38, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ACC Field Hockey Facilities (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unnecessary navbox, especially considering that 2/3 of the classified venues are currently redlinks. A classic case of creating a template for the sake of creating a template. fuzzy510 05:33, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Mike Peel 20:36, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Atlantic Sun Baseball Venues (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unnecessary navbox, especially considering that 75% of the classified venues are currently redlinks. fuzzy510 04:14, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep but then again, I created it! Seriously, I was hoping someone with more knowledge of these parks could supply some more information, especially if they saw such a template at the bottom of the Atlantic Sun Conference page. To my knowledge, the only other baseball conference currently with such a template is the ACC, which admittedly is complete. So if I need to wait until more of the venues have entries themselves, I guess I can do that. But, the ACC Field Hockey template has roughly 66% of its classified venues currently up as redlinks -- and it's been around since Nov 26 of last year. My A-Sun Baseball template is up for 6 days and it's nominated for deletion. What gives? Naytchrboy 05:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep this is actually a useful nav template, and could conceivably be used by somebody (the redlinks are future articles). The Evil Spartan 20:13, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — Carl (CBM · talk) 22:55, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nicolekidmanfilms (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

While I'm moderately okay with these templates for directors, I'm fairly certain there's a precadent for them being deleted if the subject is just an actor. After all, the template is redundant with Nicole Kidman#Filmography, which covers this much better. — EVula // talk // // 23:55, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.