Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 September 29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 29

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Generate POTD R (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Obsoleted by {{Generate POTD row}}. No longer used anywhere. howcheng {chat} 17:32, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:03, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EastEnders project (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Redundant to {{EastEnders project class}}AnemoneProjectors (talk) 13:27, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:04, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Controversy1 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This template was initially used in the main article name space. I was bold and removed them because I did not feel that the template was encyclopedic and necessary in the main article space. This template could work on Talk pages, except I feel it is redundent with a large number of templates such as Template:Calm talk, and Template:controversial.Andrew c 00:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Definitely inappropriate for placement in articles, and seems redundant with {{controversial}}, though the mention that consensus has been reached isn't provided for in that template. I'd rather give a chance for an example of how it could be useful before calling it useless. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 01:40, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The placements in main article space seem to be the actions of a single overzealous editor, Diez2, who, based on his contributions, seems to be very big on templates, and who in fact created this template a few days ago. Maybe we could just ask him to stop. I don't have an opinion on the overall template, because I'm really not all that familiar with Wikipedia's templates. --BCSWowbagger 04:59, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
After seeing Andrew c's comment below, I vote for deletion. (Maybe we should add the bit about reading the article carefully to Template:Controversial3?) Cheers, CWC(talk) 16:16, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or merge with {{controversial}}. This should clearly be a talk-page template, and IMO is better then {{controversial}} is at the moment. Agree with CWC that it should be check-talked, and I'll make that change now. --ais523 08:05, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:05, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Kerisu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nonfunctional infobox used only on User:Kerisu. The user hasn't made any contributions other than information about himself on March 12. TimBentley (talk) 02:38, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:06, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bridges in Saint Petersburg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The gargantuan template, brimming with red links, duplicates Category:Bridges in Saint Petersburg. --Ghirla -трёп- 12:59, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.