Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 October 25

< October 24	October 26 >

October 25

Template:Organize

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect yo // Pilotguy (Cleared to land) 14:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant, badly worded cleanup template. There's already a {{Cleanup-restructure}} that goes with along the multitude of existant cleanup templates. Also, the related Category:Wikipedia organize is only populated through this template and should be deleted (csd c3) if the template goes. Bobet 18:33, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to {{Cleanup-restructure}}, speedy the cat once that's been done. --ais523 07:40, 26 October 2006 (U T C)

Redirect per above -- SilverStar_talk 12:28, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per above --WikiSlasher 05:31, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Movetowiktionary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete // Pilotguy (Cleared to land) 14:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need a spaceless redirect of a template. Brad Beattie ^(talk) 06:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replace any uses and delete with {{Copy to Wiktionary}}. --ais523 07:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. There are no uses of it at the moment. --Brad Beattie ^(talk) 03:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted as vandalism. (It only had an external link to an ms paint image). - Bobet 18:38, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:4x4 type square

This template isn't what it claims to be. It's actually just spam as far as I can tell. --Brad Beattie ^(talk) 02:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:User fathers day

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to keep... // Pilotguy (Cleared to land) 14:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

this template promotes heteronormativity House Centipede 05:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep. If someone wants to wish someone else a happy father's day, by all means let them. User boxes have quite a strong precident for the bizzare (see Template:user metric-love for example). WP:BOX says that "Wikipedia is first and foremost an online encyclopedia, and as a means to that end, an online community." As such, I think this falls into the community building aspect of those means. --Brad Beattie ^(talk) 07:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per BradBeattie. I can't exactly see how this could promote heteronormativity, given that any parent or guardian can receive such a greeting - this nomination seems to err much too far on the side of political "correctness". Daveydw ee b (^chat/_patch) 09:55, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - see below. Grutness...wha? 05:25, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Gay men can have kids. Asarelah 22:41, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep more importantly, plenty of people—not just men—can be fathers! Xtifr _tälk 08:51, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, not causing any harm. Please elaborate on how people who aren't men can be fathers, fathers are male by definition --WikiSlasher 09:54, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It is not politically incorrect to be a father. The world is full of them. Valentinian ^{(talk) / (contribs)} 12:02, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:User mothers day

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was ...keep... // Pilotguy (Cleared to land) 14:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

this template promotes heteronormativity House Centipede 05:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep as per my vote on Template:User fathers day. --Brad Beattie ^(talk) 07:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per BradBeattie, and per my vote on Template:User fathers day. --Daveydw ee b (^chat/_patch) 09:56, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - see below. Grutness...wha? 05:25, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lesbians can be mothers too. Asarelah 22:40, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not causing any harm. Just like the Father's Day one it promotes WikiLove --WikiSlasher 09:56, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the comments above. Valentinian ^{(talk) / (contribs)} 12:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:User mothering sunday

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was ...*gasp* and keep! // Pilotguy (Cleared to land) 14:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

this template promotes heteronormativity House Centipede 05:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep as per my vote on Template:User fathers day. --Brad Beattie ^(talk) 07:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per BradBeattie, and per my vote on Template:User fathers day. --Daveydw ee b (^chat/_patch) 09:57, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - AsDaveydweeb points out, there is absolutely nothing about this template that indicates and acceptance of heteronormativity. Happy Mothering Sunday to Melissa Etheridge and Tammy Lynn Michaels. Grutness...wha? 05:25, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep see above. Asarelah 22:42, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep same reason as the other one. --WikiSlasher 09:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the comments above. Valentinian ^{(talk) / (contribs)} 12:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.