Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2012/February/2
February 2
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Rename. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:50, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Transferred from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy: Category:United Kingdom comics stubs to Category:British comics stubs – C2C: all other subcategories in Category:British comics use this naming convention. Fortdj33 (talk) 18:02, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Dawynn (talk) 13:08, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:17, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Don't think I've seen anything like this before. Seems to be excessively splitting hairs. Only two people tagged here. I would think these could either be tagged as {{HongKong-politician-stub}} or {{HongKong-gov-bio-stub}}. Am I missing something? Propose to delete this template, and retag articles. Dawynn (talk) 14:05, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Based on the instruction given at Category:Hong Kong politician stubs "For people who held non-elected and non-ministerial political offices, such as appointed members of the Legislative Council" I suppose the distinction being made is that they aren't technically politicians? I would think {{HongKong-gov-bio-stub}} covers this perfectly well, and is itself undersized, so no need to subdivide it to this extent. Support --Qetuth (talk) 02:23, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
Rename history stub templates
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Rename all. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 03:26, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Propose rename of the following:
- {{Karachi-history-stub}} → {{Karachi-hist-stub}}
- {{Philippines-history-stub}} → {{Philippines-hist-stub}}
- {{SierraLeone-history-stub}} → {{SierraLeone-hist-stub}}
- {{Zimbabwe-history-stub}} → {{Zimbabwe-hist-stub}}
Dawynn (talk) 13:56, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support for standardisation --Qetuth (talk) 02:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Rename. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Propose rename to {{Oklahoma-gov-stub}}. Standardization. Dawynn (talk) 13:52, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--Qetuth (talk) 02:12, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
{{Columbus-ga-stub}}
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Rename. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:42, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Propose rename to {{ColumbusGA-stub}}. Dawynn (talk) 13:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Should {{Atlanta-stub}} also become {{AtlantaGA-stub}} for standardisation? --Qetuth (talk) 02:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
{{SriLanka-food-stub}}
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Rename. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:36, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Propose rename to {{SriLanka-cuisine-stub}}, for standardization with other countries. Dawynn (talk) 13:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 04:50, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure why this even exists. There is no template for Korea, so clubs can only be tagged with the two individual country tags. And South Korea already has its own category. Propose deleting the Korea category, and moving the North Korea template and South Korea category directly under the Asia parent. Dawynn (talk) 11:41, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--Qetuth (talk) 01:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.