Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/April/17
April 17
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was upmerge and delete. R'n'B (call me Russ) 17:32, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to Category:Members of the National Assembly for Wales stubs, per the permacat (Category:Members of the National Assembly for Wales) and main article (Member of the National Assembly for Wales).
The stub category is underpopulated, however, so perhaps it should be upmerged. It seems a shame to upmerge all the way to Category:British politician stubs and Category:Welsh people stubs, but Category:Welsh politician stubs might be an appropriate higher-level category. Using AWB's list-compare feature, I found 57 articles that are in both Category:British politician stubs and Category:Welsh people stubs. -- Black Falcon (talk) 17:38, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Update: The category has been upmerged to the newly created Category:Welsh politician stubs. -- Black Falcon (talk) 16:09, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete and WP:DAFT
- moved from TfD
- Template:Small-village-of-about-1,000-inhabitants-in-Kent-stub (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Malformed template of no apparent usefulness. PamD (talk) 20:49, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with a large whacking stick. I'm not sure the last time I saw one named this oddly...and given that we deliberately don't split out inhabited places from other geo-stubs, let alone by approximate size, this one seems like a very strange stub template indeed 9as well as it being malformed in other ways). No prizes for guessing that it wasn't proposed al WP:WSS/P, BTW. Unused, too... could possibly be a speedy candidate (and a WP:DAFT candidate as well!) Grutness...wha? 00:36, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as fast as you can. Aelfthrytha (talk) 15:08, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nonsense. —innotata 13:58, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.