Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2010/April
April 20
[edit]R&B album stubs
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Rename all. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:34, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Propose renaming Category:2010s R&B album stubs to Category:2010s rhythm and blues album stubs
- Propose renaming Category:2000s R&B album stubs to Category:2000s rhythm and blues album stubs
- Propose renaming Category:1990s R&B album stubs to Category:1990s rhythm and blues album stubs
- Propose renaming Category:1980s R&B album stubs to Category:1980s rhythm and blues album stubs
- Propose renaming Category:1970s R&B album stubs to Category:1970s rhythm and blues album stubs
- Propose renaming Category:R&B album stubs to Category:Rhythm and blues album stubs
- Nominator's rationale: Per parent cat. Category:Rhythm and blues albums —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:44, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Nomination moved from Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2010/April/14. -- Black Falcon (talk) 21:17, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- support expansion of name to fit with permanent categories, also when moving a nomination from CFD to here is it possible to update the links on the caegory pages. Waacstats (talk) 07:56, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
April 14
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was rename (good heavens, these take a long time to be closed...) Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:04, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to Category:Iranian football club stubs for consistency with Category:Iranian football clubs and the Fooian football club stubs convention of the parent categories. (Stub category creator notified) -- Black Falcon (talk) 22:05, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support standardization. Waacstats (talk) 22:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename to match parent cats.--Lenticel (talk) 02:40, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Speedy rename... (Why so long time before closing?) lil2mas (talk) 09:19, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Well SFD does not attract that much attention from editors so consensus can't be reached.--Lenticel (talk) 01:49, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
Association football stubs
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Rename all. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:19, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Propose renaming
- Category:Football (soccer) club stubs to Category:Association football club stubs - convention of Category:Association football clubs
- Category:Football (soccer) competition stubs to Category:Association football competition stubs - convention of Category:Association football competitions
- Category:National football (soccer) team stubs to Category:National association football team stubs - convention of Category:National association football teams
- Category:Football (soccer) organization stubs to Category:Association football organization stubs - convention of Category:Association football organizations
- Category:Football (soccer) biography stubs to Category:Association football biography stubs - convention of Category:Association football people
- Category:Football (soccer) video game stubs to Category:Association football video game stubs - convention of Category:Association football video games (at CfD/S)
- Nominator's rationale: Standardization with naming conventions for non-national categories. -- Black Falcon (talk) 21:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support standardization. Waacstats (talk) 22:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Speedy rename... lil2mas (talk) 10:36, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
April 13
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was rename. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:39, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to Category:Berks County, Pennsylvania geography stubs - There should be a comma, not a semi-colon. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:26, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support from creator. Waacstats (talk) 22:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
April 12
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Upmerge. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:48, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nominating this category as too narrow. Will be completing more exhaustive searches soon, but for now only about 30 articles. I suggest upmerging template to Category:ZeniMax Media stubs until enough articles are found to fill this category again. Dawynn (talk) 12:07, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Rename to {{UK-MP-2010-stub}} / Category:UK MPs 2010– stubs. As a participant is the discussion, I should not normally be closing it ... but since this discussion has been open for nearly 3 months, and there is consensus to keep the stub type if it is renamed to clarify its purpose, I'm going to WP:IAR and close this debate. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:18, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Replace {{UK-current-MP-stub}} with {{UK-MP-stub}} and delete, thereby merging Category:Current British MP stubs to Category:United Kingdom MP stubs
With very few exceptions, Wikipedia does not categorize by current/former status. In the case of this stub template and category, please note that Category:Current British MPs was deleted in 2007 and the category now contains fewer than 50 articles. -- Black Falcon (talk) 08:32, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. This is not a normal mainspace category; like other stub categories, it is a maintenance category. It will be particularly valuable after the election on May 6, when there will be at least 150 new MPs in the House of Commons (144 standing down, and at least some of those seeking re-election will be defeated). Many editors will want to focus on expanding stub articles on those people who are MPs after the election, and this stub category will be very helpful in identify articles in need of expansion. It will of course need to be purged of MPs who have not been re-elected, but that's a maintenance issue. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:35, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom has been notified. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep/Wait a few months. As BrownHairedGirl says we are expecting a large number of new MPs to be elected in a few weeks time. Wait a few months and see if the activity level of the stub category has increased. Road Wizard (talk) 19:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: If this is intended to be and/or is being used as a maintenance category for one or a few WikiProjects (Biography and Politics of the United Kingdom), then it should be converted to a talk page category populated by {{WPBiography}} and {{WP UK Politics}}. I do not deny the usefulness of the category grouping as explained above, but individual-WikiProject maintenance categories have always been restricted to talk pages. -- Black Falcon (talk) 19:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think it is a WikiProject category. If you removed stub types solely because a WikiProject covers the topic then we would probably lose the vast majority of stub types. In terms of pure stub sorting, the destination category you have selected has 572 pages already; if we assume 150 new stub articles based on the estimate above then the category would need to be split anyway. If you don't like a "Current MP" split, can you suggest a workable alternative? Road Wizard (talk) 21:13, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Purely from the perspective of stub sorting, I would suggest waiting until May and renaming to Category:UK MPs 2010–present stubs or Category:UK MPs (2010–present) stubs after the election. This would be consistent with the naming convention used by subcategories of Category:MPs of the United Kingdom House of Commons, by Parliament. -- Black Falcon (talk) 21:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support that renaming after the election. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Purely from the perspective of stub sorting, I would suggest waiting until May and renaming to Category:UK MPs 2010–present stubs or Category:UK MPs (2010–present) stubs after the election. This would be consistent with the naming convention used by subcategories of Category:MPs of the United Kingdom House of Commons, by Parliament. -- Black Falcon (talk) 21:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think it is a WikiProject category. If you removed stub types solely because a WikiProject covers the topic then we would probably lose the vast majority of stub types. In terms of pure stub sorting, the destination category you have selected has 572 pages already; if we assume 150 new stub articles based on the estimate above then the category would need to be split anyway. If you don't like a "Current MP" split, can you suggest a workable alternative? Road Wizard (talk) 21:13, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename or delete. I can see the use of this approach, but we don't categorise people by 'current' and 'former' status; if renamed to 'UK MPs 2010-present', or something similar, it would be acceptable. Robofish (talk) 21:26, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
April 11
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was rename Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:00, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to Category:Documentary films about music stubs, to match permcat rename per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 April 2#Category:Music documentary films. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:36, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- support seems a good move. Waacstats (talk) 22:17, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
April 7
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Upmerge. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:50, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nominating this category as too narrow. After going through the list of games on the Bethesda Softworks page, I came up with only 18 pages for this category. That includes all developed and produced games. I did not see a list for Bethesda personnel. At this time, I vote to see the category disappear, with the template upmerged to Category:Video game companies until it can be further populated. Dawynn (talk) 15:35, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, definitly too small. Waacstats (talk) 08:52, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- See proposals. After exhaustive searches through everything that links to Bethesda Softworks, still only found 28 pages. Intend to upmerge template to the proposed new category for the parent corporation: Category:ZeniMax Media stubs. Combining the {{BethesdaSoftworks-stub}} and {{idSoftware-stub}} templates should produce enough for a good stub category. Dawynn (talk) 11:18, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Lesothan people stubs
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Rename. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:12, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Propose renaming Category:Lesothan people stubs to Category:Lesotho people stubs
- Nominator's rationale: for consistency with the other Lesotho categories, per the discussion here and because Lesothan is not a correct demonym. (Apologies if this should be speedy). BelovedFreak 20:50, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support renaming per consensus.--TM 20:54, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename per nom and previous discussions to keep these all consistent. Good Ol’factory (talk) 08:15, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:59, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Admin comment - this is merely a technical relisting, as the original listing was at WP:CFD. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:59, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename per other related categories. Waacstats (talk) 08:53, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
April 6
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was speedy delete, requested by author (G7), speedy renaming (C2) ~ mazca talk 22:06, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I misspelled "computer" for this category. Category:Minicomputer stubs created as a properly spelled replacement. Please delete category Category:Minicompuer stubs.
Dawynn (talk) 10:10, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per WP:CSD#C2A as a typographical fix. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 18:47, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- ...or WP:CSD#C1. Either one would work. Tagged with C1 at the moment. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 18:51, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.