Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 281
This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Archive 275 | ← | Archive 279 | Archive 280 | Archive 281 | Archive 282 | Archive 283 | → | Archive 285 |
Draft:L. E. Barrett
I, Seapriestess, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Seapriestess (talk) 16:58, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Requesting userfy - have hired someone to restructure the submission
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please also read WP:Paid editing and WP:COI. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:16, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Alisha Panwar
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —2405:205:A141:DC93:0:0:1E2C:80AC (talk) 13:32, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Declined. The article was deleted in accordance with WP:G11 and cannot be restored by request here. It would be best to start in draft space. I see that has been done at Draft:Alisha Panwar but this was deleted in accordance with WP:G5. Because you erroneously put an {{unblock}} tag in your request (which I have removed) I can only assume you are that banned editor. You need to get your primary account unblocked before you can participate further here. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:48, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
User:Adam9007/A7 myths debunked
On reflexion, there's nothing wrong with this essay. —Adam9007 (talk) 02:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Done as a page deleted under WP:U1.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:56, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
User:Adam9007/Common BLPPROD mistakes
On reflexion, there's nothing wrong with this essay. —Adam9007 (talk) 02:55, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Done as a page deleted under WP:U1.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:56, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
User talk:GeoJoe1000
Deleted in breach of policy. User talk pages are generally not allowed to be deleted at all. Most importantly this one was speedily deleted under criterium U1, despite user talk pages not being eligible to be deleted that way. —11:19, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Tvx1
- @Tvx1: I agree this looks strange, but because you aren't the owner of that page, I suggest you contact the deleting admin Anthony Bradbury (talk · contribs), who may have some additional background about that deletion. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:57, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- The editor whose userpage it was requested deletion under CSD U1 for his userpage, blanked his talk page and requested deletion of that as well. I deleted both; I accept that deleting the talk page was inappropriate, and have restored it.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:56, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
APEK digital
I understand that the article that I have created has been deleted through G7 (as lack of relevance). Could you please send to my email or userfy this article to me? As I do not want my content and work to be lost. Thank you. —Smehh (talk) 06:31, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Smehh: Actually it was WP:A7. @RickinBaltimore: Any objection to restoring it to draft space for improvement? ~Anachronist (talk) 17:03, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Actually yes I do. It could also be deleted for G11 as a promotional copy. With phrases like "APEK digital offers a complete solution set...", "but works with a diverse group of firms, helping to develop and create a multitude of innovative designs" it reads more like a promotion for the company. I would suggest starting from scratch, and reading over WP:CORP for information on how to create a page that is neutral and non-promotional for an organization. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:40, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
@RickinBaltimore: and @Anachronist:, thank you for the suggestions and I understand if you do not want to restore it. I am quite new to the Wikipedia community and thus, have not gone over all of the rules. I just took the information from their website (PS! I am not working in their company, as you asked before Rick). Just thought to add more Estonian design companies and elements to Wikipedia. Even, if you do not want to restore the page for me to improve, then can I at least get the work that I have put into it? Maybe, you can send it to my email or as mentioned you can userfy it as well. Thanks a ton. Smehh (talk) 18:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Smehh: I have emailed you the page source.
- Note also that if you copied information from a website, it could also have been speedy-deleted as WP:G12 (copyright violation).
- You are welcome to try again, in a sub-page from your user page, or in your sandbox, or in draft space (like Draft:APEK Digital). Please look at the short essay Wikipedia:Golden rule to get an overview of what we expect from a new article about a company. I also recommend that you use Wikipedia:Articles for creation to submit your article for review prior to publishing it in main article space. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
File:Arecibo Observatory Aerial View.jpg
The file was deleted as it was on commons but it has been deleted [1]. Can it be checked to see if suitable for refund locally? —KylieTastic (talk) 13:25, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- According to commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Arecibo_Observatory_Aerial_View.jpg the file isn't public domain, therefore it would need permission from the photographer. Then again, it's available from a government website at https://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/astronomy/downloads.jsp so I can't say I understand the deletion rationale. If the rationale is valid, I have no idea how we'd tag the image if it were restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:57, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- That site's policies make it clear that they do not only host pictures that are works of the US government. —Kusma (t·c) 11:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Rashmi Jha
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —183.87.139.218 (talk) 07:16, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Not done, the article is not deleted, just at AFD. Please read the box at the top of this page. ~Anachronist (talk) 13:59, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Sumana Mukherjee
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Kgb003 (talk) 04:33, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Not done. Article wasn't deleted by G13, it was deleted as unambiguous promotion, multiple times, and is now protected from creation. Start over in draft space or your sandbox and submit it via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Rolling dominoes
I, Kjdominoes, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kjdominoes (talk) 09:00, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Kjdominoes: Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Draft:DNA Testing Choice
I, TimBell1, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TimBell1 (talk) 09:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- @TimBell1: Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:09, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Template:WikiProject Systems/rater-data.js
This "Template" went uncontested at TfD on July 12 as an unused template. It is actually a JavaScript object to help User:Kephir/gadgets/rater determine the parameters of a WikiProject template (you can read more at User:Kephir/gadgets/rater/data-format). While the Systems WikiProject is only semi-active, this would still help sort articles that are of interest to the WikiProject if they ever become more active. Thanks, —menaechmi (talk) 17:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Fastily: It appears you deleted this template. Do you agree with the above rationale for restoration? ~Anachronist (talk) 20:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Pop PHP Framework
I would like to revisit creating this page with better support —Nicks3123 (talk) 18:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Nicks3123: There is no deleted history to restore in that article. If it helps, I have restored the contribution history of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pop PHP Framework if that old content will be useful. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stevie Lynn Jones
I, ReferenceArticle, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ReferenceArticle (talk) 00:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- @ReferenceArticle: Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Aaron Goach
(no text provided) Ramillav (talk) 07:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:22, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Imam Turki bin Abdullah Mosque
I, Emir of Wikipedia, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 11:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pop PHP Framework
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pop PHP Framework · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Nicks3123, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nicks3123 (talk) 18:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Done, but see below. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:35, 16 September 2017 (UTC)