Not done You have made only a single one reversion using undo or a script based tool. Please demonstrate some active vandalism reversion and then feel free to re-apply. Pedro : Chat 20:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Monitors numerous pages that are frequent targets of vandalism; has verifiable track record of protecting articles and judicious use of "undo" button--Ana Nim (talk) 22:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Long term account but with very low edit levels. In addition how this user has a record of "protecting articles" mystifies me a bit. No prejudice to re-application in the future. Pedro : Chat 22:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I respect your decision but want to point out two things. First, there was no "edit war" despite the characterization of one user. It was a legitimate disagreement over a fact that, in retrospect, should have been resolved on the talk page, and which I mistook for potential vandalism. It was resolved quickly and without acrimony. I am still learning protocol and the way things work around here. Second, I do indeed daily review changes to a watchlist that includes dozens of pages, some of which are targets of frequent vandalism. If you go through my contribs list you will see numerous "rv vandalism" or "rvv" entries, though sometimes others beat me to it on the pages I watch. I have only asked for the rollback privilege to make it easier to revert some vandalism which spans multiple revisions and is sometimes interlaced with valid changes. Thanks for your consideration.
Not done Under 250 edits and you do not appear to have ever used other tools (such as undo) in the past to revert vandalism. Sorry, no prejudice to reapplication after demonstrating need/ability to use the undo feature. Pedro : Chat 11:28, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(ec'd not done so added as additional rationale) Your edits seem to be almost entirely welcome templates. I'd prefer some evidence of RC patrol or CVU input using the "undo" tool first. Welcome to reapply in a couple of weeks, of course. Pedro : Chat 20:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to have the rollback feature to rollback vandals and other things. I know how to use the rollback feature and will not do anything Wikipedia disapproves of with it.-- Barkjon 01:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not done, you have very little experience and comparatively few of your edits are vandalism reverts. The undo function should be sufficient for you. Stifle (talk) 16:54, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It seems like a very elite club and I've done good recently, there was a brief period of alledged wikistalking but it was all down to Dipsomania is gone now really BpEps - t@lk12:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not done You have made only a single one reversion using undo or a script based tool. Please demonstrate some active vandalism reversion and then feel free to re-apply. Pedro : Chat 20:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)