Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/November 2008

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 01

[edit]

User:My Account

[edit]
I think i have enough edits I want to stop the vandals MyAccount 18:49, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Your request two days ago was declined - two days is not a long enough period of time in which to obtain suitable experience. GbT/c 18:51, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 02

[edit]

User:baddog144

[edit]
To use Huggle. Baddog144 (talk) 02:11, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Sorry, you do not have any experience in reverting vandalism. Additionally you have just 46 edits in the mainspace. Please gain some experience first before reapplying. —αἰτίας •discussion• 11:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)====User:MHLU====[reply]
Revert pure vandalism. MHLUtalk • extra 02:24, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Definitely ([1]) and certainly not. —αἰτίας •discussion• 12:12, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 03

[edit]

User:Mononomic

[edit]
Because I love the smell of napalm reverted vandalism in the morning. Mononomic (talk) 15:38, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Your first edit as a registered user is to add a rollback permissions request? I love the smell of socks in the afternoon...GbT/c 15:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dylan620

[edit]
I actually didn't plan to request rollback rights at first, but I will need them to download Huggle, an anti-vandalism tool. I will be taking vandalism very seriously here on Wikipedia, and I have printed the manual for Huggle. Studying the manual thoroughly should probably prevent me from going wrong. Granted I may need some practice with the rollback feature in order to get used to it, but I promise that I will use the feature with care, diligence, and responsibility. --Dylan620 (Home • yadda yadda yadda • Ooooohh!) 22:56, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Dylan.
I'm sorry, but you don't appear to have a tremendous amount of experience fighting vandalism. You should try fighting vandalism with the undo feature first to get some experience. You could also install and use Twinkle, which can mimic the rollback feature using Javascript. Twinkle also automates many other features, such as warning users, tagging pages for deletion, and filing reports on WP:UAA and WP:AIV. I would definitely recommend that you try it. If you need assistance installing it, I would be more than happy to help you. J.delanoygabsadds 00:19, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done ← template for bot J.delanoygabsadds 00:19, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 04

[edit]

User:Cssiitcic

[edit]
I could use it to easily revert vandalsim. I HATE VANDALSIM!!!! I DESPISE IT!!! I would be extremely responsible with this tool. Please trust me. I will try my best to remove vandalism.
 Not done I see little to no anti-vandalism work, and as such it is hard to adequately judge how you would use the tool. Also, your request worries me a bit and makes me feel that you may be a little over-aggressive if granted the flag. Tiptoety talk 21:14, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 05

[edit]

User:Raggonix

[edit]
I could use it to stop spammers who make two bad posts in a row. I also REALLY want to stop spammers. Raggonix 21:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done The following edits didn't seem like vandalism-reversions to me: [2][3][4][5][6] Edits like those, as they weren't vandalism, should be reverted with an explanation, and since rollback leaves no explanation, reverting those with rollback would likely lead to a removal of the tool. I kindly suggest you read up on vandalism and spam first, and demonstrate knowledge of what vandalism is, before re-requesting (by using the undo feature to revert vandalism rather than good-faith edits). Thanks. Acalamari 21:20, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:arkiedragon

[edit]
I'd like to be able to use tools to make fighting vandalism easier AJ Kirwin (talk) 06:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. You don't have enough experience for me to judge how you'd use the tool. 6 mainspace edits in the last 6 months just isn't enough. I suggest getting twinkle or huggle, reverting some vandalism, and then coming back. Oren0 (talk) 07:15, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:AlioTheFool

[edit]
I sometimes revert vandalism and it would make my life easier to have rollback. AlioTheFool (talk) 18:54, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done -- the ed. has made some very dubious contributions here, over an extended period of time--see his deleted contributions, and [7] DGG (talk) 20:07, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 06

[edit]

User:Daniel Christensen

[edit]

I have made over 40 articles on Wikipedia, 30 of which I made in the first two weeks, and have made over 2,300 edits to Wikipedia. Rollback rights would make things easier for me. Daniel Christensen (talk) 21:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done As far as I can see you do have nearly no experience in reverting vandalism. I may recommend using tools like Twinkle or undo in order to gain some experience in this area before reapplying. —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 07

[edit]

User:DJ MeXsTa

[edit]
Hey, ive been a Wikipedian since 2006 and quite often (and random), i find Vandalism on the strangest pages and i get rid of them by editing the page and deleting it (the old fashioned way lol). I'm hoping to use Rollback to speed up the removal of Vandalism and not waste time going through the whole text for the vandalism DJ MeXsTa (talk) 18:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You currently have less than 100 edits, and only a select few of those are vandalism reverts, making it hard for me to really asses your ability to use the tool. Please try using tools such as undo and or twinkle. Tiptoety talk 18:27, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:EmikoC

[edit]
I know I'm new, but I really want to do anti-vandalism work! I can't keep up with the rest of Huggle Users. So, I suppose, if you can't beat 'em, join 'em. EmikoC (talk) 00:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, I'm pretty sure that this may be doomed to fail, but why not try anyway? EmikoC (talk) 00:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You currently have less than 50 edits, and very few of those are vandalism reverts. Please try doing some more anti-vandalism work by using such tools as the undo button or twinkle, then come back in a month or so and re-request the tool. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 00:27, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 08

[edit]

User:DJ MeXsTa

[edit]
Hello again, now that i've got Twinkle and have reverted quite a few vandalised pages, Ollie thought i should try to get Rollback (again lol). DJ MeXsTa (talk) 16:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hm...there still appear to be some concerns. Tiptoety talk 21:57, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Your last request was just declined yesterday. What would have been wrong with waiting a bit and gaining some experience first before reappyling? —αἰτίας •discussion• 22:15, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Per yesterday. Pedro :  Chat  22:20, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:I am Tux

[edit]
I can't get twinkle to work I am Tux (talk) 05:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: User has very few edits. Vandalized article: [8]. Creating user-talk pages other than his own: [9]. No experience whatsoever fighting vandalism --Flewis(talk) 05:40, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Per Flewis. Tiptoety talk 21:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 09

[edit]

User:My Account

[edit]
To stop vandals from putting unuseful or unneeded info on articles. MyAccount 23:18, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You have less than 300 edits, and the majority of them have been to userspace. I ask that you gain a little more experience reverting vandalism using such tools as the undo button, or twinkle. Feel free to re-request the tool in a months time. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 23:48, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 10

[edit]

User:The Original Editor

[edit]
Not a terribly active editor (mostly read), but rollback would help out a lot, especially since TWINKLE works really slow on my internet connection :( --The Original Editor (talk) 04:40, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Sorry, with just 29 mainspace edits and (nearly) no experience in reverting vandalism it's not possible to grant rollback this time. I may recommend using tools like Twinkle or undo in order to gain some experience in this area before reapplying. —αἰτίας •discussion• 13:31, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 11

[edit]

User:Lunakeet

[edit]
I've been reverting vandalism since last year some time, and would like this to make this faster. I have Safari and a lot of anti-vandalism tools (except Twinkle, my favourite anti-vandalism tool) refuse to work, especially on a Mac. Arigatō! Lunakeet 14:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to have very little experience in reverting vandalism. Additionally this worries me. Therefore I would not grant this time. Another opinion would be appreciated. —αἰτίας •discussion• 17:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't do that edit...I'm going to go change my password because someone must know it...Lunakeet 18:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, in that case I am marking this request  Not done I would feel very uncomfortable granting rollback to a account that is possibly compromised. Tiptoety talk 23:17, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Encyclopedia77

[edit]
I used to be a vandal, but now I see that being an editor is more important. I currenrly revert vandalism with Mike's Wiki Tool, but it is not always efficent enough (doesn't include all templates, crashes everytime eventually, etc.) And I would like to use Huggle instead. It says I need rollback rights to use it. So... Encyclopedia77 (talk) 21:37, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 12

[edit]

User:HairyPerry

[edit]

(assign permissions) I used to be a vandal as of my first 2-3 articles and some non-sense on a couple of pages but that was about 900 contributions ago and I can't get Twinkle for some reason and have been fighting a lot of vandalism, just want to be more profficient. I'm a somewhat experienced editor with about 6 and a half months under my belt and over 1,000 contributions. Please, I would love to fight vandals with accuracy and consistency. HairyPerry 18:22, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note. —αἰτίας •discussion• 19:30, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done (for now) I don't really see any experience vandal fighting- in your recent contributions you only have like one vandal revert. If you can't get twinkle to work, let's fix that. Leave a message on my talk page with a description of what (if anything) happens when you try to install twinkle, and we'll see what we can do. L'Aquatique[talk] 20:53, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(ec)  Not done per [10], [11] and [12]. —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:02, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I have a lot of vandal reverts and a lot of warnings given out as well and I can't get twinkle because I have IE. As for Aitias, I didn't know one was an interwiki link and I didn't know how to tag ref, I thought the person was just breaking the ref tag, but he wasn't. HairyPerry 13:45, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's why you shouldn't be a rollbacker right now - you simply need more experience with Wikipedia. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 13:58, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Man, i just talked to somebody with 400 contributions and less experience than me and they have rollbacking rights, whats up with that? HairyPerry 14:54, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Approval (nor experience with Wikipedia) does not depend on editcountitis. Your request was declined because two days ago you made several reverts that demonstrate that you don't know lots of things. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 16:17, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 13

[edit]

User:Spittlespat

[edit]
I just want to catch more vandals using Huggle. (and I have enough edits) can I become an Rollbacker?--Spittlespat 03:22, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 14

[edit]

User:Covinben

[edit]

I was told I could request rollback permissions here, and I'm interested in keep vandalism off as many pages as possible, so this seemed like the best possible way. If there is anything in particular that I need to do before I can be a part of Wikipedia's work in that way, please let me know. -- Covinben (talk) 14:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Unfortunately, I have to decline this one. In your current edits to articles, you have little experience with vandal-fighting. Read up on vandalism, and practice reverting using the undo feature for a week or two, and then re-request rollback. Best wishes. Acalamari 17:29, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 15

[edit]

November 16

[edit]

User:Kirachinmoku

[edit]
Ive been manually reverting vandalism, rudeness and page blanking for a while and i would like the Rollback permission in order to use Huggle. Using Huggle would make things alot easier for me and so i would be able to get though more pages per day.
Kirachinmoku (talk) 18:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Sorry, other than a very few edits in September, you just started yesterday. You are doing very good work though - keep at it with Twinkle, and come back in 30 days. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 20:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sidonuke

[edit]
I wish to have rollback assigned to use Huggle. As you can see for most of my recent changes ive focused on mostly removal vandals. Sidonuke (talk) 06:48, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done I think you could do with a bit more expereince rather than just a day or so reverting. Also this wasn't vandalism. Pedro :  Chat  09:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The diff you linked me to doesn't exist but I'm open to all criticism so I may improve. Anyways I'll keep up my work and come back once I have more conribs. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 20:25, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jw_193

[edit]

It looks like Huggle would make it easier to issue warnings; I'm having to do that manually now. But to use Huggle, I need rollback rights. --Jw 193 (talk) 00:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Please come back when you have at least ~300 edits. For the time being try using the undo button or twinkle. Tiptoety talk 00:46, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Numyht

[edit]
I have been recently doing some vandal busting quite lately and after reading though the rollback and reverting articles. It sounds like a good tool to have. Numyht (talk) 21:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You appear to be using WP:UNDO to revert good faith additions to the encyclopedia, and not atempting to engage the editors in dialogue. Would you use Rollback in the same way you use undo? Pedro :  Chat  21:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have a very good point Pedro. I hereby withdraw my request until I am more expirence. Thank you. --Numyht (talk) 21:15, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Okay; marked not done but please review WP:RBK and ask for the tool when you're confident in using it and there will be no issue in granting it. Pedro :  Chat  21:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Burhan Ahmed

[edit]

Hi, I have been fighting vandalism but now i am having some problem in rolling back the vandalized edits as i dont have the rollback feature it requires me a lot of time to edit the vandalized material back to normal.BurhanAhmed (talk • contribs) 11:28, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done You were recently blocked over copyright issues, and your talk page indicates a history of problems of poor tagging for speedy deletion. In addition you don't have much experience in using undo and thisand this do not seem to be blatant vandalism (indeed vandalism at all). All in all I'm not convinced you will handle rollback with the finesse required at this time. Pedro :  Chat  12:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 21

[edit]

User:Fatal!ty

[edit]
Been here for 3.5 months, past experience with Twinkle + Huggle ( - prefer v0.82 over v0.83 which I will download once this request is completed). Solid contributions and understanding of vandalism reversion Fatal!ty (T☠LK) 13:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Since you were just unblocked from an indef block yesterday and you had been blocked for well over a month before that happened, I think you need a bit more time to demonstrate that you're going to be a productive contributor. Please come back in a month. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 13:49, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 22

[edit]

User:Suntag

[edit]
I'm looking for fast method of undoing edits like vandalism, nonsense, and others that are blatantly nonproductive. Thanks. -- Suntag ☼ 05:34, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Not done Nice contributions but the user has not demonstrated/shown any reverts in the past 2000 edits, mostly on templates, images, and categories. --Efe (talk) 06:58, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • I ask that you reconsider. When I undo revisions, I change the "Undid revision xxxxxxxxx by User" edit summary to help everyone to understand what is changed, which is the purpose of edit summaries. In addition, Principles of Wikipedia etiquette suggest explaining reversions in the edit summary box, something "Undid revision by User" does not do. If I find the person's edit raises behavior issues, I change the "Undid revision by User" to clearly indicate what I believe those behavior issues to be per dealing with disruptive editors. Rather than edits mostly on templates, images, and categories, I have 1953 project space edit (mostly in XfD), 1675 article space edits, 120 category space edits, 541 image space edits, and 1341 template space edits. In my 8,300+ edits over the past four months, I've come across many blatantly nonproductive edits and have undid them. When I come across more than one edit to an article by a vandal in a row, it now takes me considerable time to work out a way to revert the latest version made by a user other than the vandal. Rollback will allow me a more quick and efficient way to deal with such edits. Thanks for your efforts in my request. -- Suntag ☼ 14:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC) To get a better idea of what your above response entailed, I started doing undos at recent changes, something I haven't done before. The vandalism I've undid in the past had gone unnoticed for quite some time and that is what I plan to use the rollback tool for. Thanks again. -- Suntag ☼ 15:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 25

[edit]

User:Isabell121

[edit]
Hi. I would like to have rollback because I think it would help me to fight vandalism faster (eg. enable me to use tools such as Huggle) and be useful. I understand the policies and will not use it on anything other than vandalism. I greatly enjoy vandal fighting and have had experience of doing so. Thank you. Isabell121 (talk) 20:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done I'm sorry but I see almost no use of WP:UNDO or other counter-vandalism tools - just edits to your user page and welcoming notes. Please demonstrate through edits a bit more counter vandalism work and pop back here. Pedro :  Chat  21:09, 24 November 2008 (UTC)====User:EricV89====[reply]
For vandalism fighting. eric (mailbox) 04:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Admins, please note Here (Sorry, it is under the subsection "Rollback abuse?") where this user's rollbacking rights was reverted Limideen 16:00, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Sorry, but you just haven't made enough edits since your rollback privilege was removed to show that you understand why it was removed and how to use it properly in the future. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 16:13, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 26

[edit]

User:Versus22

[edit]
I would like to request rollback because it is easier to revert. I'm trying to fight vandalism. Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 03:29, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Not enough vandalism fighting experience. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 03:38, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Resplendent

[edit]
Requesting Rollback feature as well. Often I am stymied by the fact that people perform two vandalizing edits in a row, making undoing them quite a headache. Regards. --Resplendent (talk) 19:27, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done With only ~300 mainspace edits, I'm just not comfortable that you're fully capable of the responsibility quite yet. As an alternative until you get some more experience, look into installing and using Twinkle to help with vandalism fighting. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 19:46, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 27

[edit]

User:Diliff

[edit]
Mainly need it to use Huggle which will aid in responding to vandalism a bit easier. Thanks. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 09:14, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done I am sorry but as I reviewed your contributions, you had only a few reverts since September, and some of which are not totally vandals but were reverted using only the default message. Also, majority of your edits don't have edit summaries. Please make use of the undo button for a few days, and come back when you're ready. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 09:20, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, I haven't been that active with reverting since September but I have been combating vandalism on and off for the last 4 years. Also, the vast majority of my edits are on projects/talk pages where edit summaries are not usually necessary. Almost all actual changes to articles have comprehensive edit summaries. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 10:12, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Denied/November_2008&oldid=1144390562"