Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Romanization of the Russian language
Appearance
Romanization of the Russian language
[edit]Involved parties
[edit]Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:
[edit]- Kuban kazak was notified.
- An announcement on the Cyrillic naming conventions project talk page was posted.
- {{RFMF}} is inapplicable as the issue concerns more than one article.
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
[edit]Discussions between these two users with occasional involvement of third parties took place at:
- User talk:Kuban kazak/2005#Moscow Metro
- User talk:Kuban kazak/2005#Transliteration
- User talk:Kuban kazak/2005#Metro :(
- User talk:Kuban kazak/2005#A bit more on the metro
- User talk:Kuban kazak/2005#Translit
- User talk:Kuban kazak/2006 1#Новогириво
- User talk:Kuban kazak/2006 1#Okhotny Ryad/Ploshchad Revolyutsii
- User talk:Kuban kazak/2006 1#Your edit summary
- Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Cyrillic)#Proposal of another system of transliterating Russian
- Talk:Kaluzhsko-Rizhskaya Line
- User talk:Camerafiend#Transliteration (Kaluzhsko-Rizhskaja Line)
- Talk:Moscow Metro#Language
- User talk:Ezhiki#Mediation update
Issues to be mediated
[edit]- Should the Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Russian names policy (which prescribes using Wikipedia:Romanization of Russian for transliteration of the Russian language) be amended?
- Can that policy be ignored because it does not mirror "common English usage"?
- Should editors be able to ignore that policy because they do not believe it to be correct?
- Can a unilateral exception from that policy be made for the articles pertaining to the Moscow Metro stations (e.g., Template:Sokolnicheskaya Line)?
Explanations, details, and examples will be provided upon request of the Mediation Committee.
Additional issues to be mediated
[edit]- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediate
[edit]- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.
- Agree.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) 15:36, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. --Kuban kazak 13:45, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee
[edit]- Accept: Mediator to be assigned.
- For the Mediation Committee, Essjay Talk • Contact 22:33, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- I accept an assignment to this mediation, and will contact the parties. -Will Beback 20:01, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- A new mediator has been requested due to inactivity on the case. I am asking the parties to reconfirm their interest in the mediation, and if they do so, reassigning the case. Essjay Talk • Contact 01:51, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- I am willing to take this case on. --Wisden17 15:33, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- Assigned to Wisden17. Please keep me informed of the status. Essjay Talk • Contact 02:37, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Parties reconfirmation Parties: Please sign below that mediation is still requested/required.