What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.
Primary issues (added by the filing party)
Hyperlinking to non-existent pages - NikeCage68 wishes to have these names hyperlinked even though they don't exist, I do not believe they should be unless those pages are created first. Note: 109.255.200.134 and LeinsterLad are the same person - me
Order in which names should be sorted in list - I believe names should be alphabetical listed by surname, as they would appear in a squad list etc. versus NikeCage68 who believes they should be listed in chronological order, however my issue is that several transfers are announced at the same time, the order of announcement is irrelevant, and the standard listing in rugby articles is by position (when relevant) and then by surname alphabetically
Inclusion of player moving from one club to another - Relates to Jordan Coghlan. He has moved from Leinster to Munster. NikeCage68 does not believe this should be included, citing the player has signed a development contract, I have explained and sent examples of players who are on development contracts listed throughout squads. I believe NikeCage68 does not understand the difference between a development contract and an academy contract, and have attempted to show examples of how this player is being signed as a senior squad player. On this point I can elaborate further on the contract types and provide examples if required.
If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.
This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.
Reject: Fails prerequisite for mediation #4, "The parties must have first engaged in extensive discussion of the matter in dispute at the article talk page and discussion only through edit summaries will not suffice" (emphasis added). For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 04:13, 20 February 2015 (UTC) (Chairperson)[reply]
