Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Juan Manuel de Rosas
Juan Manuel de Rosas[edit]
| Formal mediation case | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Article | Juan Manuel de Rosas (talk) |
| Mediator | PhilKnight (talk) |
| Status | Awaiting party agreement |
| Notes | None |
- Users involved in dispute
- Articles concerned in this dispute
- Other steps of dispute resolution that have been attempted
- Talk:Juan Manuel de Rosas#About the lack of neutrality, the biased view and arbitrary choice of facts added into this article
- Wikipedia:Third opinion (see link directly above)
- Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Juan Manuel de Rosas (also see this)
Issues to be mediated[edit]
- Primary issues
- How, and where, should the article Juan Manuel de Rosas mention the different views of Rosas?
- Additional issues (added by other parties)
- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]
All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
- Agree. Lecen (talk) 14:36, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Agree. Cambalachero (talk) 01:29, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
- I am recused on this request and any subsequent mediation which may result from it. — TransporterMan (TALK) 18:04, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Accept to mediate disputes concerning balance and neutrality in the Juan Manuel de Rosas article. Wider issues concerning JMdR's repatriation or the Platine War will be considered outwith the scope of this case. We will assign a mediator to this dispute within two weeks. For the Mediation Committee, AGK [•] 22:23, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- PhilKnight (talk · contribs) has agreed to be the mediator for this case, so I will now hand over control of these proceedings to him. AGK [•] 11:36, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the introduction AGK. I'll start the mediation in a day or so, after I complete some background reading. PhilKnight (talk) 12:24, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but I will have to decline taking part in this discussion for the time being. I'm very busy in real life right now, and I don't know when will I have free time again. As you may notice in my contributions, I have not edited since weeks, except for passing-by comments or edits at 2:00 in the morning (which is when I finish my current tasks and distract a little before going to sleep). Initially I thought I could manage both the things I'm doing and editing in wikipedia, but unfortunately that's not the case. I do not want to have everybody sitting and waiting for my replies, and I apologize if that was the case so far. As for the article, well, if by the time I return there is still interest in discussing about it, then we may begin talking again. Cambalachero (talk) 05:41, 29 January 2013 (UTC)