Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero/request

User:Zapatancas has asked me to arrange mediation for our dispute over José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero and sub-pages eg Zapatero and the 2004 General Election. It is very bitter between us, there are sockpuppet allegations that could do with a developer looking at them, and things have been tense for months (it began in the middle of last year) but there is willingness for mediation, SqueakBox 18:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Accept pending demonstration that all parties have been notified and agree to mediation. Once this has happened, a mediator will be assigned. Essjay ^{Talk • Contact} 07:49, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- I accept. According to a note on [User talk:SqueakBox#Request for Mediation]] so does Zapatancas, though he is barely on line any more, SqueakBox 15:20, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Excuse me, but I am online as much as ever. One day per week, more or less. Zapatancas 15:24, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. Do you accept? SqueakBox 15:33, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Yes, I accept. I already told you that in your user page. Zapatancas 15:45, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are not telling me here you are telling the mediators. I propose that you and I don't now write to each other on our user talk pages but do so here. As to your comment

SqueakBox, I am very sorry but you cannot blame others for believing you have any kind of illness.

Why on earth should you believe I have some kind of mental illness? (other than just having a tantrun of course). Please elaborate as it looks to me like a personal attack. Are you a psychiatrist? I neither believe any other wikipedian believes I have a mentasl illness nor can I see any reason for you to believe so other than because you were having a tantrum. If you want this mediation to go ahead please explain your comments with relevant diffs or withdraw them, as I cannot enter mediation with someone who has never met me or spoken to me but thinks I am, mentally ill. You can imagine what I think of your extraordinary ignorance on who I am but my question is

Why should I have to tolerate this abuse?

This is not the way forward, Zapatancas, so please explain yourself, SqueakBox 16:35, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Earlier conversation

Yes, I am happy you are moving towards solving your differences with other users in a civil manner. So, I agree with starting the mediation process if you believe that the reasons that caused your past "behavior" are still valid. Zapatancas 15:08, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We would be focussing on both our past behaviours, certainly not just mine. This argument started when I put redirects on your Zapataro sub-articles, for what I felt were legitimate reasons, and you responded by creating a sock-puppett called SquealingPig. If you don't want all this stufrf brought up again (including the deadly, unforgiveable insults) I suggest you let sleeping dogs lie as SqualingPig and SquealingPigAttacksAgain will be top of the agenda on any mediation. Okay? SqueakBox 15:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SqueakBox, apologize immediately for insulting me. There is something called WP:AGF and something called WP:NPA. If you accuse me without any evidence (and you have just done that for months) you are breaking them. I always had doubs about your honesty when you claimed you wanted to sign peace. After your new agression, I can only say that a mediation process is evidently needed. Zapatancas 15:22, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SqueakBox, I am very sorry but you cannot blame others for believing you have any kind of illness. I suggest you that you organize all your complains so we can get the most from the mediation process. Zapatancas 15:49, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry and vandalism

For evidence of your association with SquealingPig is this:

This concerns the behaviour of

Zapatero (talk · contribs)
Zapatancas (talk · contribs)
SquealingPig (talk · contribs)
SquealingPigAttacksAgain (talk · contribs)

Here Zapatancas reverts SqueakBox for the first time at Zapatero's years as an opposition leader as of 09:35, May 5, 2005.
Here as of 10:23, May 5, 2005 Zapatancas reverts a huge amount of SqueakBox's work at José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero.
Here as of 10:47, May 5, 2005 SquealingPig comes along making a simple statement that betrays his non native English speaking origins.
Here as of 10:54, May 5, 2005 squeakBox responds in a civil manner *Here as of 11:00, May 5, 2005 SqueakBox reverts Zapatero's years as an opposition leader back to being a redirect. Instead of debating or reverting.
Here as of 12:02, May 5, 2005 SquealingPig vandalises SqueakBox's user page, and then proceeds to do so another 7 times
here
here
here
here
here
here
and here.

He was then blocked and has now been permanently blocked. It simply is not credible that this nasty troll was not Zapatancas, who already had 2 accounts (Zapatero and Zapatancas, though Zapatancas is nopt a sock of Zapatero), the language used is the same and he has kept up the virulenmt hatred towards me ever since. It is not credible given the timing that zapatancas was not SquealingPig, so iot is indeed zapatancas who needs to apologise ionstead of playing this game with mke. This is the essence of the problem, and this is what needs mediating, SqueakBox 16:40, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Truce link

Wikipedia:Truce.

mediator

I accept to mediate this one -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 04:16, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's all yours!

For the Mediation Committee, Essjay ^{Talk • Contact} 06:36, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please, I am here, SqueakBox 14:42, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]