Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2010 November 26
This article is one of the few articles to create general awareness of the commercial/professional diving industry which has been significant in the support for offshore market but yet normally overlooked
Reaper1818 (talk) 01:48, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
I've cleaned up a few small things, but your big problem is a complete lack of WP:Independent sources. Has your company been in the news? The basic notability standards for businesses say that only businesses that have received significant attention from at least one independent, WP:Third-party source can have articles. (This is primarily to prevent people from using Wikipedia to advertise themselves.) You may also with to read the FAQ for businesses. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
I am requesting feedback on this page. Please note this is my first Wikipedia article. This is an article about membraneless fuel cells that work on different principles from most modern cells. It explains how the fuel cells work and some interesting research in self-pumping that can be applied to these types of cells.
Tapan89 (talk) 02:41, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I am new to this as well, but i know some about fuel cells, i added my comments to the User_talk:Tapan89/Membraneless_Fuel_Cells page.
Larkuur (talk) 12:39, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Larkuur for your feedback! I will try and get to some of the editing by this week and incorporate your suggestions!
- I do think perhaps a lot of what the first few parts of the article covers is also covered already by the fuel cell article. Chevymontecarlo 09:55, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
So is that a bad thing? Should I get rid of that part? It was in an effort to keep the basic summary and reasoning for using laminar cells on the same page.
Hi, i would like to put this in as a new article.
Larkuur (talk) 12:34, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
- Wow, most of this just goes right over my head....nevermind, I can comment as to the actual article rather than the subject! It seems like a notable subject, but I do think you might want to add more links to other articles perhaps. Chevymontecarlo 09:56, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the response, i added a few more sources, links to see also, and a few lines in the beginning that defines the context slightly better.
And with that, i put the article live, can now be found at:
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Gebhart_factor and http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Gebhart_method (Larkuur (talk) 22:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC))
I wonder if this is ready to go?
Dandilion Dave (talk) 15:06, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
- You certainly seem to have a good amount of references, so I don't think that is a problem. The article might benefit from an infobox though. Chevymontecarlo 09:47, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
I wonder if this needs any more references?
Dandilion Dave (talk) 17:31, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
- I think if you can find some more references it might help, but at the moment I think it's fine. I do think you could perhaps do with adding some names though, like this:
<ref>[http://www.example.com|reference name goes here!]</ref>
and also maybe an infobox as well. Hope this is useful. Chevymontecarlo 09:51, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
This article is the biography and background of Albert Folch Folch, a contemporary physicisit/bioengineer that also does really cool art (combining art and science) and has written some books. Definitely notable! You will notice an unusual "Background" section (couldn't find a better title). I happened to know of him through the art world and was able to get his background family info through him directly by email (but it's all referenced). The section could be deleted, but I think it adds color to the bio and it's relevant to his upbringing, since many members of his family were intellectuals of such high caliber. Please review this article and let me know if I referenced all the necessary statements or some are missing ... Please be kind, it's my first contribution! :-)